Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
Multiple Regression01:25

Multiple Regression

Multiple regression assesses a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and two or more independent variables. It has many practical applications.
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterization of rumen microbiota in lactating Holstein cows fed molasses versus corn grain at two levels of rumen-degradable protein.

Frontiers in microbiomes·2026
Same author

Automated phenotyping of mammary gland tissues using computer vision systems.

Journal of dairy science·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence for animal identification: Development of a computer vision system for reliable dairy cattle traceability across developmental phases.

Journal of dairy science·2026
Same author

Safe, sustainable, legal use and trade in wild species: testing a new five-dimensional sustainability assessment.

One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2025
Same author

Three-dimensional markerless pose estimation for anatomical landmarks of the shoulder and upper limb.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology·2025
Same author

Corrigendum to "Assessing different cross-validation schemes for predicting novel traits using sensor data: An application to dry matter intake and residual feed intake using milk spectral data" (J. Dairy Sci. 107:8084-8099).

Journal of dairy science·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Dimension reduction and variable selection for genomic selection: application to predicting milk yield in Holsteins.

N Long1, D Gianola, G J M Rosa

  • 1Department of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA. nlong@wisc.edu

Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics = Zeitschrift Fur Tierzuchtung Und Zuchtungsbiologie
|July 14, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Supervised PCR II and sparse PLS effectively predict dairy bull genetic merit using fewer SNPs. These dimension reduction methods improve genomic breeding value prediction accuracy and cost-effectiveness.

More Related Videos

An Efficient Single-Person Technique for Milk Sampling from Laboratory Mice
04:56

An Efficient Single-Person Technique for Milk Sampling from Laboratory Mice

Published on: March 28, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

An Efficient Single-Person Technique for Milk Sampling from Laboratory Mice
04:56

An Efficient Single-Person Technique for Milk Sampling from Laboratory Mice

Published on: March 28, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Animal Genetics
  • Genomic Selection
  • Statistical Genomics

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of genetic merit is crucial for livestock breeding.
  • Genome-assisted prediction requires models handling massive marker data and fewer observations.
  • Dimension reduction and marker selection are key strategies for genomic selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate supervised Principal Component Regression (PCR) and sparse Partial Least Squares (PLS) for predicting dairy bull genomic breeding values (BV) for milk yield.
  • To assess the performance of these methods in combining dimension reduction and variable selection using single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

Main Methods:

  • Applied supervised PCR (Methods I and II) and sparse PLS to predict genomic BV for milk yield in dairy bulls.
  • Supervised PCR II utilized multiple-SNP analyses, outperforming single-SNP analysis (Method I).
  • Evaluated predictive ability using varying SNP subset sizes and compared results to a full SNP set PCR model.

Main Results:

  • Supervised PCR II demonstrated superior predictive ability compared to supervised PCR I.
  • Sparse PLS showed intermediate performance between the two supervised PCR methods.
  • Supervised PCR II with 300-500 SNPs achieved 80-87% of the predictive correlation obtained with all 32,518 SNPs.
  • Predictive correlation plateaued around 0.68 with 3500 SNPs using supervised PCR II.

Conclusions:

  • Combining dimension reduction and variable selection offers a powerful approach for accurate and cost-effective genomic BV prediction.
  • Supervised PCR II and sparse PLS are promising methods for genomic selection in dairy cattle.
  • These methods can reduce the number of SNPs required for accurate prediction, lowering costs.