Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Causal models for randomized trials with two active treatments and continuous compliance.
Yan Ma1, Jason Roy, Bess Marcus
1Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. yam2007@med.cornell.edu
This study introduces a new statistical model for analyzing causal effects in clinical trials with continuous compliance measures. The method helps estimate treatment effectiveness even when patients don't fully adhere to their assigned treatments.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Methodology
- Causal Inference
Background:
- Clinical trials often involve continuous measures of treatment compliance.
- Estimating causal effects with continuous compliance, especially with two active treatments, presents significant challenges.
- Existing methods may struggle to accurately assess treatment efficacy under varying levels of patient adherence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel structural model for principal causal effects with continuous compliance.
- To develop identifiable marginal compliance models within study arms.
- To provide a framework for sensitivity analysis regarding unidentifiable parameters in compliance modeling.
Main Methods:
- A structural model for principal causal effects was developed.
- Marginal compliance models were specified and shown to be identifiable.
- A Gaussian copula model was employed for the joint distribution of observed and counterfactual compliance.
- A sensitivity analysis was conducted by varying the dependence parameter of the copula model.
Main Results:
- The proposed methodology allows for the estimation of causal effects in the presence of continuous compliance measures.
- The analysis of a smoking cessation trial demonstrated the practical application of the model.
- Causal effects were estimated at specific compliance levels and within subpopulations exhibiting similar compliance behaviors.
Conclusions:
- The developed statistical framework effectively addresses the challenges of estimating causal effects with continuous compliance in clinical trials.
- The methodology provides valuable insights into treatment effectiveness by accounting for varying patient adherence.
- The approach is applicable to real-world clinical trial data, as shown in the smoking cessation trial example.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Censoring Survival Data

