Comparison of the pick-and-smear and Saccomanno methods for sputum cytologic analysis

The two methods of preparing sputum specimens for cytologic study, the (fresh) pick-and-smear technique and the (blended) Saccomanno technique, were compared using 249 consecutive specimens. Two slides were prepared for each specimen by each technique. Of the specimens, 103 showed squamous metaplasia, carcinoma in situ or carcinoma. A semiquantitative rating system (0 to 4+) was used to determine the number of diagnostic cells for each method for those 103 cases. More diagnostic cells were found on the Saccomanno preparations (217) than on the fresh preparations (154). There were 121 diagnostic cells in the Saccomanno preparations versus 95 diagnostic cells in the fresh preparations from 63 squamous metaplasias; 7 versus 3 for the preparations from 5 carcinomas in situ; 64 versus 42 from 28 squamous cell carcinomas; 3 versus 1 from 1 large cell undiffernomas; and 12 diagnostic cells in Saccomanno preparations versus 5 in fresh preparations from 3 small cell cancers. Twelve squamous metaplasias, two carcinomas in situ, four squamous carcinomas, one adenocarcinoma and one small cell cancer had no diagnostic cells on the fresh preparations; four squamous metaplasias and one squamous carcinoma had no diagnostic cells on the Saccomanno preparations. More diagnostic information and fewer false-negative results were achieved with the Saccomanno technique.