Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

15:57
Application of Long-term cultured Interferon-γ Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay for Assessing Effector and Memory T Cell Responses in Cattle
Published on: July 11, 2015
Distinguishing tuberculosis from Mycobacterium avium complex disease using an interferon-gamma release assay
1Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Korea.
Summary
The Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) and Interferon Gamma Release Assays (IGRAs) like QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G) and QuantiFERON-TB (QFT) showed similar accuracy in diagnosing TB. However, these tests could not reliably differentiate active TB from Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease in TB-endemic areas.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Microbiology
- Immunology
Background:
- Distinguishing tuberculosis (TB) from non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease is crucial, particularly in areas with high TB prevalence.
- Interferon Gamma Release Assays (IGRAs), including QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G) and its predecessor QuantiFERON-TB (QFT), are used alongside the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) for TB diagnosis.
- Challenges arise when differentiating active TB from Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease due to overlapping immune responses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic utility of TST, QFT-G, and QFT in differentiating active TB from MAC lung disease.
- To assess the performance of these diagnostic tools in an intermediate TB burden country.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study comparing the diagnostic performance of TST, QFT-G, and QFT.
- Inclusion of 38 patients with confirmed TB and 40 patients with confirmed MAC lung disease.
- Analysis of test accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for TB diagnosis.
Main Results:
- TST showed positive results in 70.6% of TB patients and 47.5% of MAC patients.
- QFT-G yielded positive results in 89.5% of TB patients and 34.3% of MAC patients.
- QFT showed positive results in 86.8% of TB patients and 35.3% of MAC patients, with similar overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity across all three tests for TB diagnosis.
Conclusions:
- The TST and IGRAs (QFT-G and QFT) demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy for TB.
- These tests were unable to reliably discriminate between active TB and MAC disease.
- The findings suggest limitations of TST and IGRAs in differentiating active TB from MAC disease in TB-endemic settings.