Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Influence of atrial function and mechanical synchrony on LV hemodynamic status in heart failure patients on
Hsin-Yueh Liang1, Alan Cheng, Kuan-Cheng Chang
1Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to evaluate atrial and ventricular function in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Background:
Right atrial pacing (AP) in CRT induces delays in electrical and mechanical activation of the left atrium. The influence of atrial sensing (AS) versus AP on ventricular performance in CRT and the mechanisms underlying the differences between AS and AP in CRT have not been fully elucidated.
Methods:
Fifty-five patients with heart failure undergoing CRT for 9 ± 12.5 months and 22 control subjects without heart failure were enrolled. Conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography was performed to examine atrial and ventricular mechanics and hemodynamic status.
Results:
The optimal atrioventricular interval was shorter in AS compared with AP mode (126 ± 19 ms vs. 155 ± 20 ms, p < 0.0001). Left ventricular (LV) outflow tract time-velocity integral (22 ± 7 cm vs. 20 ± 7 cm, p < 0.001), diastolic filling period (468 ± 124 ms vs. 380 ± 93 ms, p < 0.001), and global strain (-32 ± 24% vs. -27 ± 22%, p = 0.001) were greater in AS compared with AP mode. Atrial strain was higher in AS compared with AP mode in the right atrium (-28.2 ± 8.6% vs. -22.6 ± 7.6%, p = 0.0007), interatrial septum (-17.1 ± 6.5% vs. -13.2 ± 5.4%, p = 0.002), and left atrium (-16.4 ± 11.0% vs. -13.6 ± 8.5%, p = 0.02). There was no difference in intraventricular dyssynchrony but significantly lower atrial dyssynchrony in AS compared with AP mode (31 ± 19 ms vs. 42 ± 24 ms, p = 0.0002).
Conclusions:
AS is associated with preserved atrial contractility and atrial synchrony, resulting in optimal LV diastolic filling, stroke volume, and LV systolic mechanics. This pacing mode maximizes LV performance and the hemodynamic benefit of CRT in patients with heart failure.
More Related Videos
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
07:49A Pacing-Controlled Procedure for the Assessment of Heart Rate-Dependent Diastolic Functions in Murine Heart Failure Models
Published on: July 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure V: Medical Management