A systematic review of factors predicting door to balloon time in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated

Michael C Peterson1, Tyler Syndergaard, Josh Bowler

  • 1University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. michael.peterson@hsc.utah.edu

Insights

Door to balloon time in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is crucial. This review identifies patient, hospital, and care factors influencing this critical metric for primary percutaneous intervention outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Door to balloon time is a key determinant of outcomes for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PCI).
  • Identifying factors that influence this time is essential for optimizing patient care.
  • This review synthesizes evidence on prognostic factors affecting door to balloon time in STEMI patients treated with PCI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and summarize prognostic factors associated with door to balloon time in STEMI patients.
  • To identify modifiable and non-modifiable factors that impact the timeliness of primary PCI.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search was conducted using NLM Gateway and Cochrane CENTRAL.
  • Articles were screened by title and abstract, with full-text retrieval for relevant studies.
  • Included articles were assessed for risk of bias, and findings were summarized qualitatively.

Main Results:

  • Ninety papers were included, with variable and generally low study quality.
  • Factors associated with longer door to balloon times include pre-hospital delay, cerebrovascular disease, absence of chest pain, lower PCI volume, lower ST elevation, absence of Q waves, and left bundle branch block.
  • Shorter times were linked to presentation during regular hours, recent PCI year, 24-hour cardiology, pre-hospital ECG, streamlined lab activation, and culprit vessel PCI before full angiography.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding the prognostic factors for door to balloon time is vital for enhancing the quality of care for STEMI patients.
  • Targeting identified factors can lead to improved treatment efficiency and patient outcomes.
Abstract