Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Assessing the adequacy of postexperimental inquiries in deception research and the factors that promote participant
Ginette C Blackhart1, Kelly E Brown, Travis Clark
1Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, P.O. Box 70649, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA. gblackhart@scientia.cc
Abstract:
The primary aim of this research was to assess the adequacy of postexperimental inquiries (PEI) used in deception research, as well as to examine whether mood state, reward, or administering the PEI as a face-to-face interview or computer survey impacts participants' willingness to divulge suspicion or knowledge about a study. We also sought to determine why participants are not always forthcoming on the PEI. Study 1 examined how frequently PEIs are included in research and found that most researchers employing deception do use a PEI. Studies 2 and 3 showed that participants are often unwilling to divulge suspicion or awareness of deception or to admit to having prior knowledge about a study, though offering a reward and completing the PEI on a computer modestly improved awareness and admission rates. Study 4 indicated several reasons why participants may not reveal suspicion or knowledge about a study on the PEI.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Ethics in Research
Deindividuation
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

