Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Application of Nonlinear Inequalities01:29

Application of Nonlinear Inequalities

251
A nonlinear inequality describes a comparison involving an expression that curves or behaves more complexly than a straight line. These inequalities often appear in forms that include squares, products, or variables in the denominator.To solve such an inequality, one starts by rewriting it so that zero appears on one side. For example, the inequality:  can be factored as: This form makes it easier to identify the values that cause the expression to equal zero. In this case, the...
251
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Causes of Nonlinearity01:22

Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Causes of Nonlinearity

729
Nonlinearity in drug pharmacokinetics is caused by various factors influencing how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted. Understanding these nonlinear processes is crucial for predicting drug behavior in the body and optimizing drug dosing regimens.
Nonlinear drug absorption can occur when the process is rate-limited by solubility, carrier-mediated transport systems, or saturation of the presystemic gut wall or hepatic metabolism. For instance, high doses of riboflavin...
729
What is an Electrochemical Gradient?01:26

What is an Electrochemical Gradient?

127.8K
Adenosine triphosphate, or ATP, is considered the primary energy source in cells. However, energy can also be stored in the electrochemical gradient of an ion across the plasma membrane, which is determined by two factors: its chemical and electrical gradients.
The chemical gradient relies on differences in the abundance of a substance on the outside versus the inside of a cell and flows from areas of high to low ion concentration. In contrast, the electrical gradient revolves around an...
127.8K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.2K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.2K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is the whole more than the sum of its parts? Considering global and local features of the connectome improves prediction of individuals and phenotypes.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

SAR-Efficient Sub-Volume Imaging Using Nonlinear Gradient Magnetic Fields.

Journal of imaging·2026
Same author

Using connectome-based predictive models to reveal the systems standardized tests and clinical symptoms are reflecting.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Patients' pain experience in claudication: Biopsychosocial correlates of frequency, intensity, sleep interference, and chronic pain.

The journal of pain·2026
Same author

Optimizing functional connectivity scanning conditions for predicting autistic traits.

Nature. Mental health·2026
Same author

Feature overlap in transdiagnostic connectome-based models of sustained attention and autism symptoms.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate
11:57

Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate

Published on: September 13, 2019

7.0K

Spin dephasing under nonlinear gradients: implications for imaging and field mapping.

Gigi Galiana1, Jason P Stockmann, Leo Tam

  • 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. gigi.galiana@yale.edu

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|July 16, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Nonlinear magnetic resonance gradients cause skewed phase evolution and signal loss, differing from linear gradients. Neglecting these effects can lead to errors in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) field mapping.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Scattering Nonlinearities from a Single Plasmonic Nanoparticle
15:06

Measurement of Scattering Nonlinearities from a Single Plasmonic Nanoparticle

Published on: January 3, 2016

13.4K
Electron Spin Resonance Micro-imaging of Live Species for Oxygen Mapping
09:40

Electron Spin Resonance Micro-imaging of Live Species for Oxygen Mapping

Published on: August 26, 2010

22.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate
11:57

Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate

Published on: September 13, 2019

7.0K
Measurement of Scattering Nonlinearities from a Single Plasmonic Nanoparticle
15:06

Measurement of Scattering Nonlinearities from a Single Plasmonic Nanoparticle

Published on: January 3, 2016

13.4K
Electron Spin Resonance Micro-imaging of Live Species for Oxygen Mapping
09:40

Electron Spin Resonance Micro-imaging of Live Species for Oxygen Mapping

Published on: August 26, 2010

22.7K

Area of Science:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Nonlinear Gradient Fields
  • Signal Dephasing Dynamics

Background:

  • Nonlinear magnetic field gradients are crucial for advanced MRI techniques.
  • Understanding intravoxel dephasing under nonlinear gradients is essential for accurate imaging.
  • Previous studies primarily focused on linear gradient field behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the MR echo signal in nonlinear magnetic fields, specifically quadratic fields.
  • To identify and analyze differences in dephasing and phase evolution compared to linear gradients.
  • To develop simplified approximations for predicting nonlinear MR signal behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of spin dynamics in a quadratic nonlinear field.
  • Experimental demonstration of intravoxel dephasing and phase evolution.
  • Derivation of simplified signal equations and predictive rules.

Main Results:

  • Nonlinear gradients cause skewed and asymmetric frequency distributions within a voxel.
  • Intravoxel dephasing leads to nonlinear phase evolution, not just signal loss.
  • Experimental results confirm significant errors in field mapping when nonlinear dynamics are ignored.

Conclusions:

  • Nonlinear gradient effects in MRI are distinct from linear cases and impact signal evolution.
  • Accurate MRI requires accounting for nonlinear dephasing and phase dynamics.
  • Simplified approximations can effectively predict and manage nonlinear MR signal behavior.