Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Functionalized Spirocyclic Heterocycle Synthesis and Cytotoxicity Assay
Published on: February 9, 2021
Structure-activity relationship analyses of glycyrrhetinic acid derivatives as anticancer agents
B Lallemand1, M Gelbcke, J Dubois
1Laboratoire de Chimie BioAnalytique, Toxicologie et Chimie Physique Appliquée, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract:
Cancer cell resistance to kinase inhibitors and targeted agents, acquisition of a multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotype and/or intrinsic resistance to apoptosis prevent effective treatment in about 50% of solid cancers in adults, and the percentage is even higher in children. Glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) and some of its derivatives may offer hope in combating cancer types associated with poor prognoses. Some GA derivatives are indeed able to target both the proteasome and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), two proteins that play major roles in cancer cell biology but are not related to MDR and/or apoptosis-related resistance phenotypes.
Insights
Glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) derivatives show promise for treating cancers resistant to standard therapies. These compounds target key cancer cell proteins unrelated to multidrug resistance or apoptosis evasion, offering new therapeutic avenues.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Cancer treatment faces challenges due to multidrug resistance (MDR) and apoptosis resistance, impacting approximately 50% of adult solid cancers and even more in pediatric cases.
- Existing kinase inhibitors and targeted therapies are often ineffective against these resistant cancer phenotypes.
- Glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) and its derivatives present a potential strategy to overcome treatment resistance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the potential of Glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) derivatives in overcoming cancer cell resistance.
- To explore GA derivatives' mechanisms of action against cancer types with poor prognoses.
- To identify novel therapeutic targets beyond MDR and apoptosis pathways.
Main Methods:
- The study focuses on the biological activity of GA derivatives.
- Investigates the interaction of GA derivatives with specific cellular targets.
- Examines the role of proteasome and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in cancer cell biology.
Main Results:
- Some GA derivatives demonstrate the ability to target both the proteasome and PPARs.
- These targeted proteins are crucial in cancer cell biology.
- The targeted pathways are distinct from those involved in MDR and apoptosis resistance.
Conclusions:
- GA derivatives offer a promising new approach for treating resistant cancers.
- Targeting the proteasome and PPARs represents a novel strategy for cancer therapy.
- Further research into GA derivatives could lead to improved cancer treatment outcomes for patients with poor prognoses.
Related Concept Videos
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence its...
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of the aromatic...
Direct-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
The direct-acting...
Indirect-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Reversible inhibitors display short to medium durations of action. Short-acting agents include simple alcohols with...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Cholinergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship