Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
Critical Thinking I01:24

Critical Thinking I

Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career with...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II01:25

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I01:26

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I

A nursing diagnosis is written when the nurse recognizes a cluster of essential patient data indicating health problems treated with independent nursing interventions. The standardized terminologies of a nursing diagnosis help nurses identify and treat patients' problems. Every electronic health record that uses nursing diagnosis must employ standard diagnostic terminology. Developing an efficient, individualized care plan begins with accurate nursing diagnoses.
There are thirteen domains for...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An evolution-based hypothesis on the origin and mechanisms of autoimmune disease.

Immunology and cell biology·1998
Same author

Species variation in the metabolism of 15,16-dihydro-11-methylcyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-one to its 3,4-dihydrodiol, the proximate carcinogen.

Carcinogenesis·1995
Same author

The presence of a trifluoromethyl rather than a methyl substituent in the bay-region greatly decreases the DNA-binding and tumour-initiating activity of the cyclopenta[alpha]phenanthren-17-ones.

Carcinogenesis·1995
Same author

CYP1 induction, binding to the hepatic aromatic hydrocarbon receptor and mutagenicity of a series of 11-alkoxy cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-ones: a structure activity relationship.

Toxicology·1995
Same author

The influence of dihydrodiol conformation on the metabolic activation of cyclopenta[a]phenanthrenes.

Toxicology letters·1995
Same author

Intimal injury in variant angina.

Lancet (London, England)·1994

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Education debate: clinical diagnostic reasoning.

G W Boyd1

  • 1Department of Medicine, QEII Medical Centre, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. graham.boyd@uwa.edu.au

Internal Medicine Journal
|July 19, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This article introduces a new way of thinking about how doctors form diagnoses. Instead of using memorized checklists, the method organizes clinical data into four categories: anatomical, pathological, physiological, and aetiological. Each piece of information is assigned to one of these categories as the case develops. This helps clinicians build a more complete and individualized diagnosis. The approach allows for dynamic interpretation of symptoms and signs, leading to a final diagnosis that is tailored to the patient. The method supports a more flexible and patient-centered diagnostic process. It suggests a potential improvement over current problem-based learning strategies in medical education.

Keywords:
clinical reasoningdiagnostic frameworkmedical educationpatient-centered diagnosis

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Medical education
  • Clinical reasoning
  • Diagnostic methods

Background:

Understanding how clinicians form diagnoses remains a challenge. Research has shown that experienced practitioners use rational methods, but the exact logic is unclear. Traditional diagnostic approaches often rely on memorized checklists. These methods may not capture the complexity of real-world cases. Patients present with unique combinations of symptoms and conditions. Standard approaches may not adapt well to individual variations. This gap motivated the development of a more flexible diagnostic framework. The goal is to improve how students and professionals learn to reason through diagnoses.

Purpose Of The Study:

This work aims to introduce a structured diagnostic reasoning model. The model is based on four distinct diagnostic categories. These categories help organize clinical data during patient evaluation. The approach allows for dynamic interpretation of symptoms and signs. It emphasizes the integration of different diagnostic elements. The method supports a patient-centered rather than a checklist-driven process. It is intended to enhance current problem-based learning strategies. The purpose is to improve the accuracy and adaptability of clinical reasoning.

Main Methods:

The method categorizes diagnostic information into four domains. These include anatomical, pathological, physiological, and aetiological aspects. Each piece of clinical data is assigned to one of these categories. The process is iterative as more information becomes available. Interpretations are made within and across these domains. Sub-conclusions are drawn as the case progresses. The final diagnosis emerges from the synthesis of these sub-conclusions. The approach avoids rigid diagnostic templates or memorized sequences.

Main Results:

Assigning data to four diagnostic categories improves clarity. The method allows for a more comprehensive interpretation of clinical findings. It supports the development of individualized diagnostic reasoning. The system reduces reliance on pre-learned diagnostic lists. It enables clinicians to consider multiple aspects simultaneously. The approach facilitates a more flexible and adaptive diagnostic process. It aligns with how experienced clinicians form diagnoses. The method provides a structured yet adaptable diagnostic framework.

Conclusions:

The proposed system offers a structured approach to clinical reasoning. It supports the integration of diverse diagnostic information. The method aligns with how experienced clinicians form diagnoses. It reduces dependence on memorized diagnostic checklists. The approach allows for a more patient-centered diagnostic process. It may improve the accuracy of clinical reasoning in education. The system provides a framework for dynamic diagnostic interpretation. It suggests a potential advancement over current problem-based methods.

The approach organizes clinical data into four categories: anatomical, pathological, physiological, and aetiological.

It avoids rigid lists by allowing dynamic interpretation of patient-specific data across four categories.

It allows for a more comprehensive and flexible interpretation of clinical findings as the case unfolds.

It identifies the background cause of the condition, contributing to a more complete understanding of the case.

It adapts to the unique presentation of each patient rather than relying on pre-learned diagnostic patterns.

They propose it may improve clinical reasoning education and reduce reliance on memorized diagnostic lists.