Removal of pectus bar fixed with absorbable vs metallic stabilizers
Michele Torre1, Giovanni Rapuzzi, Valentina Rossi
1Pediatric Surgery, Istituto Gaslini, 16148 Genova, Italy.
Background/Purpose:
The removal of a pectus bar fixed with a metallic stabilizer can be time consuming and tedious, because in some cases, fibrous or new bone tissue covers the metallic devices. Our study aims to evaluate bar removal in 2 groups of patients with metallic and absorbable stabilizers, respectively.
Methods:
A total of 162 patients underwent mini-invasive repair of pectus excavatum. In all the cases, the bar was stabilized with at least 1 stabilizer on the left side. We used both metallic and absorbable stabilizers. Absorbable stabilizers were preferred when they were available in the market. The bar was removed in 30 patients. We compared removal of the bar in 17 absorbable stabilizers with those bars fixed with 18 metallic stabilizers. Length of incision, operative time, postoperative pain, and complications were studied.
Results:
No differences between metallic and absorbable stabilizers were found in terms of postoperative pain and complications. However, removal of the bar fixed with an absorbable stabilizer required a significantly smaller incision and shorter operative time.
Conclusions:
Removal of the pectus bar fixed with an absorbable stabilizer was simpler and faster.
More Related Videos
10:09Adjustable Stiffness, External Fixator for the Rat Femur Osteotomy and Segmental Bone Defect Models
Published on: October 9, 2014
07:35Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects
Published on: April 11, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
The Thoracic Cage: Sternum
The sternum is the elongated bony structure on the anterior side of the thoracic cage. It consists of three parts: the manubrium, the body, and the xiphoid process.
Pneumothorax-II
Clinical Manifestations:
