Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Wet Beveling of Microinjection Needles Utilizing Constant Air Pressure for Feedback on Needle Opening
Published on: September 27, 2024
Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles
Emre Altundasar1, Emre Nagas, Ozgur Uyanik
1Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey. emresan@gmail.com
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of apically extruded irrigant using 2 Ni-Ti rotary systems. Forty mandibular premolars with single canals were randomly assigned into 4 groups. Flower arrangement foam cubes were weighed with a precision balance before being attached to the apical portions of all teeth. In group 1, preparation was completed with ProTaper files. In group 2 canals were prepared with RaCe files. In groups 1 and 2, the irrigant was delivered with a 30-gauge conventional dental needle. In groups 3 and 4, teeth were prepared as in groups 1 and 2 with the exception that the irrigant was delivered with a side-vented irrigation needle. The weight of the extruded material (irrigant and debris) for each group was calculated by comparing the pre- and postinstrumentation weights of the foams used for periapical modeling. Obtained data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests, with P equals .05 as the level for statistical significance. ProTaper files used with regular needle irrigation had the highest fluid extrusion. The lowest irrigant extrusion was observed with the RaCe system combined with a side-vented irrigation needle. Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that irrigation needle and rotary instruments have an effect on the amount of extruded root canal irrigant.
