Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Echocardiographic Assessment of Cardiac Anatomy and Function in Adult Rats
Published on: December 13, 2019
[The evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by tissue Doppler echocardiography in essential hypertension]
Fang-Fang Wang1, Xin-Heng Feng, Bao-Xia Chen
1Department of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Insights
Essential hypertension impairs left ventricular diastolic function, detectable by both conventional pulse-wave Doppler echocardiography (cPWD) and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI). DTI, specifically Em and E/Em measurements, offers greater sensitivity in assessing diastolic dysfunction progression.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Hypertension Research
Background:
- Essential hypertension is a prevalent condition associated with cardiovascular complications.
- Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is an early indicator of hypertensive heart disease.
- Accurate assessment of diastolic function is crucial for managing hypertension.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of conventional pulse-wave Doppler echocardiography (cPWD) and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) in evaluating LV diastolic function in patients with essential hypertension.
- To identify which modality is more sensitive in detecting early diastolic dysfunction.
Main Methods:
- Two hundred essential hypertension patients were categorized into normal LV mass (NLVH) and LVH subgroups, alongside 160 healthy controls.
- Mitral valve flow pattern (MVFP) was assessed using cPWD to measure early (E) and late (A) diastolic velocities and the E/A ratio.
- Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) was employed to measure the early diastolic mitral annular velocity (Em) and calculate the E/Em ratio.
Main Results:
- Essential hypertension patients exhibited LV diastolic dysfunction by both cPWD (higher E, lower E/A ratio) and DTI (lower Em, higher E/Em ratio) compared to controls (P < 0.01).
- The LVH subgroup showed significantly reduced Em and elevated E/Em compared to the NLVH subgroup (P < 0.05), with no significant difference in A or E/A.
- These findings indicate impaired diastolic function in hypertensive individuals, with DTI parameters being more responsive to disease progression.
Conclusions:
- Both cPWD and DTI are valuable tools for detecting diastolic dysfunction in the non-hypertrophic stage of hypertension.
- Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) parameters, specifically Em and E/Em, demonstrate higher sensitivity and precision in reflecting the progression of diastolic dysfunction in hypertension.
Objective:
To evaluate Left ventricular(LV) diastolic function in essential hypertension by conventional pulse-wave Doppler echocardiography (cPWD) and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) and compare the two modalities.
Methods:
Two hundred patients with essential hypertension were classified as NLVH subgroup (n = 160) and LVH subgroup (n = 40) based on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) with one hundred and sixty health subjects as control group. The mitral valve flow pattern (MVFP) was obtained.Early diastolic (E) and late velocities (A) were measured and E/A was calculated. DTI was used to obtain the left ventricular lateral wall early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (Em) and E/Em was calculated.
Results:
Essential hypertension patients had LV diastolic dysfunction both by cPWD (higher E and lower E/A ratio) and DTI (lower Em and higher E/Em ratio) compared with healthy subjects [E: (0.88 ± 0.18) cm/s vs (0.76 ± 0.19) cm/s; E/A ratio: 0.86 ± 0.28 vs 1.02 ± 0.38; Em: (9.4 ± 2.8) cm/s vs (11.9 ± 3.8) cm/s; E/Em ratio: 7.9 ± 2.7 vs 6.0 ± 1.8: with all P value < 0.01]. Em was significantly reduced and E/Em was significantly elevated in LVH subgroup than NLVH subgroup [Em: (7.7 ± 2.6) cm/s vs (9.9 ± 2.8) cm/s, E/Em:9.6 ± 3.6 vs 7.4 ± 2.4, P < 0.05]. No significant difference was found in A and E/A between these two subgroups [(0.90 ± 0.22) cm/s vs (0.87 ± 0.17) cm/s; 0.80 ± 0.34 vs 0.88 ± 0.28, P > 0.05].
Conclusions:
cPWD and DTI both had implications to detect diastolic dysfunction in non-hypertrophic stage hypertension. Em, E/Em could be more sensitive and precise to reflect the impairment of diastolic function in the progress of hypertension.
Related Concept Videos
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
