Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
Biostatistics: Overview01:20

Biostatistics: Overview

Biostatistics plays a crucial role in understanding and analyzing data in healthcare and biology. Biostatisticians conduct experiments, gather evidence, and draw meaningful conclusions using statistical methods and techniques. Different variables form the foundation of biostatistical analysis, allowing researchers to understand and interpret data effectively. These variables are classified into different types, each serving a specific purpose in statistical analysis.
Discrete variables are...
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
Ecological Disturbance02:26

Ecological Disturbance

An ecological disturbance is a temporary disruption in the environment resulting from abiotic, biotic, or anthropogenic factors, causing a pronounced change in an ecosystem. The impact of an ecological disturbance, which can depend on its intensity, frequency, and spatial distribution, plays a significant role in shaping the species diversity within the ecosystem.
Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment β-Patchoulene, CAS Registry Number 514-51-2.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2018
Same author

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 3-methyl-5-(2,2,3-trimethyl-3-cyclopenten-1-yl)pent-4-en-2-ol, CAS Registry Number 67801-20-1.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2018
Same author

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, tetrahydro-4-methyl-2-(2-methylpropen-1-yl)pyran, CAS Registry Number 16409-43-1.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2017
Same author

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, terpineol, CAS Registry Number 8000-41-7.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2017
Same author

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, p-methoxybenzonitrile, CAS Registry Number 874-90-8.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2017
Same author

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, acetic acid, C8-10-branched alkyl esters, C9-rich, CAS Registry Number 108419-33-6.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans
08:14

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans

Published on: April 28, 2023

Variability: noise or information in ecotoxicology?

P Calow

    Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology
    |July 26, 2011
    PubMed
    Summary

    Variability in species and genotypes affects toxicant responses. Controlling this variability is crucial for accurate ecotoxicity testing and ecological risk assessments.

    Area of Science:

    • Environmental toxicology
    • Ecotoxicology
    • Genetics

    Background:

    • Organismal responses to toxicants exhibit significant inter- and intra-species variability.
    • This variability poses challenges for standardized ecotoxicity testing.
    • Accurate ecological risk assessments necessitate accounting for genetic and species-specific differences.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To address the variability in toxicant responses within and between species.
    • To describe methodologies for controlling variability in ecotoxicity tests.
    • To outline approaches for incorporating variability into ecological risk assessments.

    Main Methods:

    • Standardization of ecotoxicity test protocols to minimize environmental factors.
    • Selection of representative genotypes within species for testing.

    More Related Videos

    Ecotoxicological Method with Marine Bacteria Vibrio anguillarum to Evaluate the Acute Toxicity of Environmental Contaminants
    11:26

    Ecotoxicological Method with Marine Bacteria Vibrio anguillarum to Evaluate the Acute Toxicity of Environmental Contaminants

    Published on: May 26, 2017

    Sealable Femtoliter Chamber Arrays for Cell-free Biology
    13:44

    Sealable Femtoliter Chamber Arrays for Cell-free Biology

    Published on: March 11, 2015

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 30, 2026

    Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans
    08:14

    Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans

    Published on: April 28, 2023

    Ecotoxicological Method with Marine Bacteria Vibrio anguillarum to Evaluate the Acute Toxicity of Environmental Contaminants
    11:26

    Ecotoxicological Method with Marine Bacteria Vibrio anguillarum to Evaluate the Acute Toxicity of Environmental Contaminants

    Published on: May 26, 2017

    Sealable Femtoliter Chamber Arrays for Cell-free Biology
    13:44

    Sealable Femtoliter Chamber Arrays for Cell-free Biology

    Published on: March 11, 2015

  • Statistical analysis to quantify and account for inter- and intra-species variability.
  • Development of risk assessment frameworks that integrate toxicological data with species-specific sensitivities.

    • Main Results:

    • Established protocols for controlling environmental and genetic factors in ecotoxicity assays.
    • Quantified the extent of variability in toxicant responses across different species and genotypes.
    • Demonstrated the impact of variability on the interpretation of ecotoxicity data.
    • Provided a framework for more robust ecological risk assessments.

    Conclusions:

    • Controlling variability is essential for reliable ecotoxicity testing.
    • Ecological risk assessments must explicitly consider species and genotypic differences in toxicant sensitivity.
    • The methodologies presented enhance the accuracy and relevance of environmental hazard evaluations.