Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Simulation technique for difficult intubation: teaching tool or new hazard?

J S Goldberg1, A C Bernard, R J Marks

  • 1Anesthesiology Service, Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, NC 27705.

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cerebral homeostasis and orthostatic responses in residents of the highest city in the world.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

[Congenital heart disease : fistula from circumflex artery to coronary sinus].

Revue medicale de Liege·2019
Same author

A Case of Inflamed Strangulated Inguinal Hernia: Operation: Removal of 4½ Inches of Omentum: Recovery.

The Indian medical gazette·2017
Same author

Case of Ovariotomy.

The Indian medical gazette·2017
Same author

Prostatic Enlargement in Natives.

The Indian medical gazette·2017
Same author

A Case of Intestinal Obstruction, Due to a Stone; Operation : Recovery.

The Indian medical gazette·2017
Same journal

NRFit connectors: Implementation after the engineering solution.

Journal of clinical anesthesia·2026
Same journal

Retraction notice to 'The effect of play distraction on anxiety prior to pre-medication administration: A randomized trial' [Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 36 (2017) 27-31].

Journal of clinical anesthesia·2026
Same journal

Sodium bicarbonate alkalinization of local anesthetics for peripheral nerve blocks: A systematic review.

Journal of clinical anesthesia·2026
Same journal

Dynamic changes in oxygen-hemoglobin affinity during liver transplantation.

Journal of clinical anesthesia·2026
Same journal

AI-assisted interpretation of arterial blood gases using a hybrid Stewart and standard base excess model.

Journal of clinical anesthesia·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Effect of midodrine on orthostatic intolerance after hip and knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial (the MOBiLE study)" [Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Volume 113 (2026), 112261].

Journal of clinical anesthesia·2026
See all related articles

Simulation drills for difficult intubation training may increase the risk of esophageal intubation in anesthesia personnel. Careful consideration of these potential hazards is crucial before implementing such training methods.

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Medical Simulation
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Difficult intubation presents a significant challenge in anesthesia.
  • Simulation drills are used to enhance anesthesia personnel skills for managing airway emergencies.
  • Evaluating the risks associated with these simulation drills is essential for patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the risks of a simulation drill designed to improve anesthesia personnel's ability to manage unexpected difficult intubations.
  • To compare adverse events between standard intubation techniques and simulated difficult airway intubation using an endotracheal tube introducer.

Main Methods:

  • A controlled prospective study involving 40 patients with normal airways undergoing noncardiothoracic surgery.
  • Patients were randomized into a control group (standard intubation) and a simulation group (simulated difficult airway with introducer).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, blood pressure) and oxygen saturation were monitored; adverse events were meticulously recorded.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences were observed in hemodynamic changes or oxygen saturation between the groups.
    • Five instances of uncomplicated esophageal intubation occurred in the simulation group, versus none in the control group (p = 0.001).
    • No other adverse events, such as myocardial ischemia, arrhythmias, pulmonary aspiration, or tracheal injury, were recorded.

    Conclusions:

    • Simulation drills for difficult airway management may lead to an increased incidence of esophageal intubation.
    • The potential risk of esophageal intubation during simulation drills warrants careful consideration.
    • While simulation is valuable, its associated risks must be weighed against training benefits to ensure patient safety.