Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes
Published on: December 15, 2023
Foster placement disruptions associated with problem behavior: mitigating a threshold effect
Philip A Fisher1, Mike Stoolmiller, Anne M Mannering
1Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, Oregon 97401, USA. philf@oslc.org
Insights
Child problem behaviors predict foster care placement disruptions. A treatment foster care intervention mitigated this risk, showing the importance of early preventative services for foster children.
Area of Science:
- Child Psychology
- Foster Care Research
- Intervention Studies
Background:
- Foster care placement disruptions negatively impact children's well-being.
- Identifying predictors of disruption is crucial for targeted support.
- Previous research suggests child problem behaviors are a key predictor.
Purpose of the Study:
- To replicate findings on child problem behaviors predicting foster care placement disruptions.
- To assess if a treatment foster care intervention mitigates this association.
- To understand the impact of behavioral issues on placement stability.
Main Methods:
- Compared 60 children in regular foster care with 57 in treatment foster care.
- Assessed child problem behaviors using the Parent Daily Report Checklist over 3 months.
- Tracked placement disruptions for 12 months.
Main Results:
- In regular foster care, each additional problem behavior increased disruption risk by 10%.
- Treatment foster care intervention eliminated the link between problem behaviors and disruption risk.
- A threshold effect was observed in regular foster care, but not in the intervention group.
Conclusions:
- Child problem behaviors are significant predictors of foster care placement disruptions.
- Treatment foster care interventions show promise in preventing disruptions.
- Early, targeted interventions are essential for improving placement stability in foster care.
Objective:
Placement disruptions have adverse effects on foster children. Identifying reliable predictors of placement disruptions might assist in the allocation of services to prevent disruptions. There were two objectives in this study: (a) to replicate a prior finding that the number of daily child problem behaviors at entry into a new foster home predicts subsequent placement disruptions in foster preschoolers and (b) to determine whether this association is mitigated by a treatment foster care intervention.
Method:
Problem behavior and placement disruptions were examined in 60 children in regular foster care (age range = 3.10-5.91 years [M = 4.34, SD = 0.83], 58.3% male, 93.4% Caucasian) and 57 children in a treatment foster care program (age range = 3.01-6.78 years [M = 4.54, SD = 0.86], 49.1% male, 82.5% Caucasian). Using the Parent Daily Report Checklist (Chamberlain & Reid, 1987), a brief telephone interview, foster caregivers reported problem behavior 6 times over 3 months. Placement disruptions were tracked over 12 months.
Results:
The regular foster care children with 5 or fewer problem behaviors were at low risk for disruption, but their risk increased 10% for each additional behavior (p = .013). The intervention appeared to mitigate this "threshold effect"; number of problem behaviors did not predict risk of placement disruption in the treatment foster care group (p = .63).
Conclusions:
These findings replicate previous evidence linking child problem behavior to placement disruptions and further highlight the need for early preventative interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Behavior Modification
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Social Facilitation
Punishment
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Role of Shaping in Operant Conditioning
The steps involved in shaping begin with reinforcing any response that resembles the desired behavior. For example, parents might praise a child for picking up one toy. As...

