Foster placement disruptions associated with problem behavior: mitigating a threshold effect

Philip A Fisher1, Mike Stoolmiller, Anne M Mannering

  • 1Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, Oregon 97401, USA. philf@oslc.org

Insights

Child problem behaviors predict foster care placement disruptions. A treatment foster care intervention mitigated this risk, showing the importance of early preventative services for foster children.

Area of Science:

  • Child Psychology
  • Foster Care Research
  • Intervention Studies

Background:

  • Foster care placement disruptions negatively impact children's well-being.
  • Identifying predictors of disruption is crucial for targeted support.
  • Previous research suggests child problem behaviors are a key predictor.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To replicate findings on child problem behaviors predicting foster care placement disruptions.
  • To assess if a treatment foster care intervention mitigates this association.
  • To understand the impact of behavioral issues on placement stability.

Main Methods:

  • Compared 60 children in regular foster care with 57 in treatment foster care.
  • Assessed child problem behaviors using the Parent Daily Report Checklist over 3 months.
  • Tracked placement disruptions for 12 months.

Main Results:

  • In regular foster care, each additional problem behavior increased disruption risk by 10%.
  • Treatment foster care intervention eliminated the link between problem behaviors and disruption risk.
  • A threshold effect was observed in regular foster care, but not in the intervention group.

Conclusions:

  • Child problem behaviors are significant predictors of foster care placement disruptions.
  • Treatment foster care interventions show promise in preventing disruptions.
  • Early, targeted interventions are essential for improving placement stability in foster care.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Operant Conditioning Intervention01:24

Operant Conditioning Intervention

Operant conditioning serves as a foundational principle in therapeutic interventions aimed at modifying maladaptive behaviors. Central to this approach is the notion that behaviors, both adaptive and maladaptive, are learned through reinforcement. By analyzing the environmental factors that reinforce problematic behaviors, clinicians can design interventions to weaken these reinforcements and replace maladaptive behaviors with healthier alternatives.
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
Punishment01:27

Punishment

Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Role of Shaping in Operant Conditioning01:19

Role of Shaping in Operant Conditioning

Shaping is a technique used in operant conditioning to train complex behaviors by rewarding successive approximations toward the target behavior. This method is necessary because organisms are unlikely to perform complex behaviors spontaneously. Instead, shaping breaks down the desired behavior into small, manageable steps.
The steps involved in shaping begin with reinforcing any response that resembles the desired behavior. For example, parents might praise a child for picking up one toy. As...