Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Collection, Isolation, and Flow Cytometric Analysis of Human Endocervical Samples
Published on: July 6, 2014
Gendered HIV risk patterns among polygynous sero-discordant couples in Uganda
Katherine A Muldoon1, Kate Shannon, Sarah Khanakwa
1BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada.
Abstract:
Stable serodiscordant relationships and sexual concurrency are pathways that contribute to the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa. However whether polygyny imparts the same risks as informal concurrent relationships remains an open research question. Using data collected at enrollment from a cohort study of sero-discordant couples, this analysis investigates how polygynous relationships differ from those involving only a single female spouse and whether men involved in polygynous partnerships are more likely to report HIV-risk behaviour than those in single spouse partnerships. Of 444 enrolled couples, 111 (25%) were polygynous and 333 (75%) were single-spouse partnerships. We found that polygynous men were more likely to report controlling sexual decision-making and to report any unprotected sex with unknown sero-status partner. After controlling for potential confounders, polygynous men were still more likely to report unprotected sex with an unknown sero-status partner. In this sample of sero-discordant couples we found indication of excess HIV-risk behaviour among men involved in polygynous relationships.
Related Concept Videos
Amebiasis
Sex Linked Disorders
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Sex-linked Disorders
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

