Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Mapping Alzheimer's Disease Variants to Their Target Genes Using Computational Analysis of Chromatin Configuration
Published on: January 9, 2020
Targeted enrichment beyond the consensus coding DNA sequence exome reveals exons with higher variant densities
Matthew N Bainbridge1, Min Wang, Yuanqing Wu
1Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
DNA capture sequencing outside consensus coding DNA sequence (CCDS) regions shows reduced efficiency and higher variant density. This highlights limitations in current genetic enrichment methods for non-CCDS elements.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Molecular Biology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- DNA hybridization-capture followed by high-throughput sequencing is a key tool in genetics.
- Current methods primarily target consensus coding DNA sequence (CCDS) exons.
- CCDS excludes many coding and non-coding functional regions, limiting understanding of variant density and interrogation outside these areas.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the performance of DNA capture sequencing in regions outside the CCDS.
- To assess variant density in non-CCDS regions compared to CCDS.
- To understand the impact of genomic subregions on capture efficiency.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of capture sequence data from regions outside CCDS.
- Examination of sequencing platform biases (Illumina, SOLiD).
- Comparison of variant density between CCDS and non-CCDS regions, including predicted exons and RefSeq/Vega specific exons.
Main Results:
- Extreme GC content in genomic subregions significantly reduces capture sequence coverage outside CCDS (<50% relative to CCDS).
- Sequencing platform biases exacerbate capture inefficiencies.
- microRNA and predicted exons showed higher than expected capture coverage compared to whole genome sequencing.
- Non-CCDS regions, particularly predicted exons and RefSeq/Vega specific exonic regions, exhibit substantially higher variant densities than CCDS.
Conclusions:
- Regions outside CCDS perform less efficiently in capture sequencing experiments.
- Computationally predicted exons demonstrate over 2.5 times higher variant density compared to CCDS.
- Current capture strategies may underestimate genetic variation in non-CCDS regions.
Related Concept Videos
lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs
Histone Variants at the Centromere
Exon Recombination
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon...
DNA-only Transposons
The donor site from where the transposon is excised is either degraded or...
Cis-regulatory Sequences
From DNA to Protein

