Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
Published on: February 22, 2020
Welfare of aquatic organisms: is there some faith-based HARKing going on here?
Howard I Browman1, Anne Berit Skiftesvik
1Institute of Marine Research, Austevoll Research Station, 5392 Storebø, Norway. howard.browman@imr.no
Abstract:
Much of the literature on aquatic animal welfare is flawed by 4 non-mutually exclusive (and often inter-related) biases: under-reporting/ignoring of negative results, faith-based research and/or interpretations, Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (HARKing), and inflating the science boundary. These biases have an insidious impact on the credibility of the 'science' surrounding aquatic animal welfare. While concerns about the welfare of aquatic organisms are valid, research on this topic should be grounded in the scientific method, embrace negative results, avoid faith-based interpretations of experimental results and/or HARKing, and strictly respect the science boundary.
Related Concept Videos
Sustainable Development
Quality of Water
Microbial Wastewater Treatment
Osmoregulation in Fishes
Parental Care
Healthcare Agencies II
Parish nursing is a growing specialty nursing profession that focuses on holistic healthcare, health promotion, and illness prevention. It blends professional nursing practice with a health ministry, focusing on health and healing within the context of a Christian community. Parish nurses serve as health educators, referral sources, and lay...

