Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of topical fluoride preparations.

J R Mellberg1

  • 1Colgate-Palmolive Company, Technology Center, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854.

Journal of Dental Research
|February 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Evaluating topical fluoride products involves clinical and laboratory tests. Fluoride uptake is key, but in vivo results may differ from in vitro data, impacting anticaries efficacy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The mechanism of fluoride protection.

Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)·1997
Same author

Fluoride in oral health.

Archivos latinoamericanos de nutricion·1992
Same author

Effect of calcium in model plaque on the anticaries activity of fluoride in vitro.

Journal of dental research·1992
Same author

A study of the ability of an in situ remineralization model to differentiate between the effects of two fluoride dentifrices that produced significantly different clinical caries results.

Journal of dental research·1992
Same author

Findings from an in situ thin-section sandwich model for evaluating cariogenic and anti-cariogenic activity.

Journal of dental research·1992
Same author

Hard-tissue substrates for evaluation of cariogenic and anti-cariogenic activity in situ.

Journal of dental research·1992

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Cariology
  • Fluoride Chemistry

Background:

  • Topical fluoride products are crucial for preventing tooth decay.
  • Clinical and laboratory assessments are necessary for evaluating their efficacy.
  • Fluoride uptake is a common laboratory metric, but its correlation with clinical outcomes requires nuanced interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the relationship between fluoride product formulations, anticaries mechanisms, and laboratory/clinical assessment data.
  • To investigate the role of fluoride uptake and ambient fluoride concentration in early caries lesions.
  • To determine if fluoride compound, concentration, or formulation (e.g., varnishes, gels) significantly impacts clinical effectiveness.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing clinical and laboratory data on topical fluoride products.
  • Analysis of fluoride uptake by enamel in vitro and its potential in vivo relevance.
  • Comparison of clinical effectiveness data for different fluoride compounds, concentrations, and delivery systems.

Main Results:

  • Fluoride uptake data alone may not predict clinical efficacy.
  • Both fluoride uptake by lesions and ambient fluoride at cariogenic sites appear important.
  • No clear superiority of one fluoride compound over another, despite in vitro uptake differences.
  • Increased fluoride concentration enhances anticaries effectiveness non-linearly.
  • Gelling agents and fluoride varnishes do not show demonstrated superiority over topical solutions or gels in clinical effectiveness.

Conclusions:

  • In vivo fluoride uptake at cariogenic sites may differ from in vitro findings.
  • Clinical efficacy of topical fluorides is influenced by fluoride concentration and availability.
  • Current evidence does not support the superiority of specific fluoride compounds or formulations like varnishes over other topical applications.

Related Experiment Videos