Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Can decision analysis adequately represent clinical problems?

J G Dolan1

  • 1Department of Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, NY 14621.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical decision analysis.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2001
Same author

A survey of gynecologists' attitudes regarding decision making in the management of non-cancerous conditions that frequently result in hysterectomy.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·1999
Same author

A method for evaluating health care providers' decision making: the Provider Decision Process Assessment Instrument.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·1999
Same author

A survey of clinicians' opinions regarding the value of published decision analyses as sources of clinically useful information.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·1997
Same author

Preferences of pregnant women and physicians for 2 strategies for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis in neonates.

Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine·1997
Same author

Are patients capable of using the analytic hierarchy process and willing to use it to help make clinical decisions?

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·1995
Same journal

Many multicenter randomized controlled trials do not account for center effect: a methodological review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Patient Acceptability of the Modified Zelen Approach to Randomized Trials - A Survey of the CAPS THA Cohort.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to SPICE-GRADE: simultaneous processing of indirect causal evidence in complex pathways using GRADE - an exploratory case study. [Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 194C (2026) 112219].

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Small numbers of clusters in cluster randomised trials: a scoping review of problems and proposed solutions.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

What's the Meta Now? More Updates on the Problems with Systematic Reviews.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

A scoping review of guidance on sharing trial results with patients and the public finds inconsistent recommendations and limited methodological development.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Medical decision analysis models often fail to represent complex clinical choices. Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) revealed a preferred alternative, correcting misinterpretations of prior analyses.

Area of Science:

  • Decision Analysis
  • Medical Decision Making
  • Operations Research

Background:

  • Single attribute utility models are commonly used in medical decision analysis.
  • These models often inadequately represent complex clinical decision-making scenarios.
  • Previous analyses using limited models have led to misinterpretations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the limitations of single attribute utility models in medical decision analysis.
  • To reanalyze a previously published decision analysis using a more representative model.
  • To demonstrate how a more robust decision model can lead to different conclusions.

Main Methods:

  • Reanalysis of a well-known medical decision analysis.
  • Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a multiobjective decision-making technique.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing a more representative decision model compared to single attribute utility models.

    • Main Results:

    • The reanalysis identified a clearly preferred alternative between the decision options.
    • The original analysis, which concluded equivalence, was shown to be misinterpreted.
    • The choice of decision model significantly impacts the interpretation of the analysis results.

    Conclusions:

    • The limitations of single attribute utility models restrict the conclusions drawn from medical decision analyses.
    • More representative multiobjective decision models, such as AHP, can improve clinical decision analysis.
    • Accurate interpretation of medical decision analysis relies on the representativeness of the decision model used.