Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

06:31
Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose (MED) Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
Published on: October 3, 2019
FDA-sunlamp recommended Maximum Timer Interval And Exposure Schedule: consensus ISO/CIE dose equivalence
John C Dowdy1, Eugene A Czako, Michael E Stepp
1Rapid Precision Testing Laboratories, Cordova, TN, USA. RPTLDowdy@aol.com
Health Physics
|July 30, 2011
Summary
New sunlamp exposure limits proposed by the USFDA/CDRH may significantly increase UV exposure. A revised maximum of 500 J(CIE) m(-2) is suggested for tanning equipment to ensure biological equivalence.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology and Photobiology
- Medical Device Regulation
- Public Health
Background:
- Current USFDA sunlamp guidance uses unique erythema action spectrum and timer intervals.
- USFDA/CDRH proposed revisions in 2003 to align with ISO/CIE standards, aiming for biological equivalence.
- Preliminary analyses suggested these revisions could lead to increased UV exposure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare current USFDA sunlamp exposure limits with proposed USFDA/CDRH revisions.
- To verify and quantify the erythemal dose equivalence between current and proposed sunlamp exposure policies.
- To propose a revised maximum exposure limit and tanning schedule compatible with existing equipment and standards.
Main Methods:
- Calculated sunlamp maximum exposure times based on current USFDA policy and proposed USFDA/CDRH revisions.
- Utilized 89 UV spectra from U.S. indoor tanning equipment provided by manufacturers.
- Determined CIE effective dose per USFDA maximum recommended exposure time (Te) and compared it to ISO/CIE Standard Erythema Dose (SED).
Main Results:
- The CIE effective dose per Te averaged 456 J(CIE) m(-2) (approx. 4.5 SED) across analyzed tanning equipment.
- The USFDA/CDRH proposed 600 J(CIE) m(-2) maximum exposure exceeds current Te erythemal dose by approximately 33%.
- No analyzed sunlamps exceeded 5 SED, suggesting a revised maximum of 500 J(CIE) m(-2) is feasible.
Conclusions:
- The proposed USFDA/CDRH revisions do not ensure biological equivalence and may increase UV exposure.
- A revised maximum exposure limit of 500 J(CIE) m(-2) is recommended for compatibility with current tanning equipment.
- A phased tanning acclimatization and maintenance schedule, starting at 1 SED and increasing to 5 SED, is proposed as biologically equivalent to current USFDA policy.

