Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for malformations in newborn infants exposed to potential teratogens
Lewis B Holmes1, Marie-Noel Westgate
1Active Malformations Surveillance Program, Department of Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. holmes.lewis@mgh.harvard.edu
Insights
Standardizing criteria for identifying infant malformations is crucial for accurate teratogen surveillance. This study developed definitions to distinguish malformations from common variations in newborn examinations.
Area of Science:
- Medical Surveillance
- Neonatal Health
- Teratology
Background:
- Newborn surveillance for teratogen exposure often relies on non-standardized physician examination findings.
- Infants may present with diverse physical features, including malformations, birthmarks, and positional deformities.
- Lack of standardized criteria complicates accurate identification of malformations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop standardized criteria and definitions for identifying infant malformations.
- To establish criteria for excluding common, less severe physical features that are not malformations.
- To improve accuracy in malformation surveillance programs.
Main Methods:
- Reviewed medical records of 1000 consecutive liveborn, stillborn infants, and elective terminations.
- Pediatricians' recorded physical features were analyzed.
- Developed exclusion criteria for non-malformation findings.
Main Results:
- A malformation (structural abnormality of medical importance) was identified in 2.8% (18/1000) of infants.
- 222 other features were excluded, including birthmarks (110), minor anomalies/normal variations (65), and gene/chromosome abnormalities (10).
- Excluded features also included positional deformities, prematurity-related findings, and physiologic findings.
Conclusions:
- Establishment of advance exclusion criteria is essential for malformation surveillance programs and pregnancy registries.
- Consistent criteria are vital when reviewing routine medical records for exposed and unexposed groups.
- Standardized definitions enhance the reliability of teratogen surveillance data.
Background:
The surveillance of newborn infants exposed to potential teratogens often relies on the findings in routine physicians' examinations to identify malformations. Exposed newborn infants can have a wide variety of physical features, including malformations, birth marks, positional deformities, and minor anomalies. The routine physician's findings are not standardized. Some physicians record a wide variety of physical features and others do not. The purpose of this study was to develop criteria and definitions for identifying malformations and for identifying the more common and less severe physical features that would be excluded as not being malformations.
Methods:
The physical features recorded by the examining pediatricians were obtained from a review of the medical records of a consecutive sample of 1000 liveborn and stillborn infants and elective terminations for fetal anomalies.
Results:
A malformation, defined as a structural abnormality with surgical, medical or cosmetic importance, was present in 18 (2.8%) of the infants; 222 other recorded features were identified and excluded: malformations attributed to dominant or recessive genes (4) or chromosome abnormalities (6), minor anomalies and normal variations (65), birth marks (110), positional deformities (6), prematurity-related features (5), physiologic findings (4) and findings identified by prenatal ultrasound (but not by the examining pediatrician) (20), functional abnormalities (1) and findings in newborn screening (1).
Conclusions:
Investigators should establish, in advance, the exclusion criteria to be used in programs, such as malformation surveillance programs or pregnancy registries, whose findings are based on a review of the routine examinations in medical records. It is essential that the same criteria be used in evaluating the drug-exposed and the unexposed comparison group.
More Related Videos
08:50A Murine Model of Fetal Exposure to Maternal Inflammation to Study the Effects of Acute Chorioamnionitis on Newborn Intestinal Development
Published on: June 24, 2020
08:22A Novel Strategy Combining Array-CGH, Whole-exome Sequencing and In Utero Electroporation in Rodents to Identify Causative Genes for Brain Malformations
Published on: December 1, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Teratogenicity
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Neurulation
Physiological Barriers
The blood endothelial barrier is the most porous of these. It allows all small ionized, un-ionized, and lipophilic molecules to pass through the endothelial lining into the interstitial space...