Multi-wavelength pulse oximeter is not suitable for adjusting D(LCO) measurements
Gregg L Ruppel1, Holly A Wilson, Vanessa K Gall
1Pulmonary Function Laboratory, Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Department, St Louis University Hospital, St Louis, Missouri 63110-0250, USA. ruppelgl@slu.edu
Background:
Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D(LCO)) can be affected by abnormal hemoglobin (Hb) or carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) levels. Predicted D(LCO) can be adjusted to reflect abnormal Hb or COHb levels. Until recently, blood sampling was required to determine Hb and COHb levels, but a new pulse oximeter, the Masimo RAD-57, can measure Hb and COHb noninvasively. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference between the invasive and noninvasive Hb and COHb measurements for adjusting D(LCO).
Methods:
In patients referred to our university hospital for D(LCO) testing, we simultaneously took arterial blood gas samples and measured Hb and COHb with the RAD-57 (SpHb and SpCOHb, respectively). We analyzed the paired values and the Hb-adjusted and COHb-adjusted predicted D(LCO) values with t tests and Bland-Altman plots. We compared the differences in predicted D(LCO) to a clinical threshold of 3 mL/min/mm Hg.
Results:
SpHb differed from Hb measured via arterial blood analysis (12.1 ± 2.4 g/dL vs 13.3 ± 2.1 g/dL, P < .001). SpCOHb did not differ significantly from COHb (ie, measured via arterial blood analysis) (2.1 ± 4.0 vs 2.5 ± 2.3, P = .25), but there was wide variability. There were small but statistically significant differences in the adjusted predicted D(LCO), depending on whether blood or pulse oximetry values were used. Predicted D(LCO) adjusted for both Hb and COHb was 22.5 ± 4.8 mL/min/mm Hg measured with the RAD-57 and 23.5 ± 4.5 mL/min/mm Hg via arterial blood analysis (P < .001). The limits of agreement for pulse oximetry adjusted D(LCO) exceeded the clinical threshold of 3 mL/min/mm Hg for Hb adjustments and combined Hb + COHb. Predicted D(LCO) values differed by > 3 mL/min/mm Hg in 17% of patients.
Conclusions:
Pulse oximetry may be of limited usefulness for adjusting either predicted or measured D(LCO) values, but might be useful to screen patients for invasive testing, particularly if the D(LCO) is close to the lower limit of normal.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Pulse Oximetry
Purpose
Average SpO2 values are greater than 95%. If the readings fall below 90%, it indicates that...
01:19Special considerations while measuring oxygen saturation
Ensuring accuracy in vital sign recordings while prioritizing patient comfort and minimizing anxiety is important.
01:19Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
01:13Special considerations while measuring pulse
01:05Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
01:30Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...