Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Decision making and risk attitude of the common marmoset in a gambling task
Hironobu Tokuno1, Ikuko Tanaka
1Laboratory of Brain Structure, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Kamikitazawa, Setagaya, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan. tokuno-hr@igakuken.or.jp
Abstract:
To analyze decision making under uncertainty of monkeys, common marmosets were trained to choose and remove one of two colored caps on wells arranged side by side. Each well contained constant reward (3 grains of puffed rice) or risky reward (0 or 6 grains; probability, 50%:50%). For each marmoset, white or black color was assigned randomly as a symbol of non-risky or risky choice. Arrangement of white and black caps was determined randomly in each trial. After 200 trials (5 trials per day), the marmosets were classified according to the pattern of their choice. Eight of 18 marmosets (44.4%) were risk-aversive, whereas 5 marmosets (27.8%) were risk-prone. The remaining 5 marmosets (27.8%) preferred to choose one side (left n=4, right n=1). These results showed individual differences in decision making of marmosets. An additional task with reduction in the expected value of the preferred choice revealed that risk-aversive marmosets were slower to adjust their choices to such reductions than risk-prone animals.
More Related Videos
07:42An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
Published on: August 2, 2018
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...