Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Testing Acetylcholine Followed by Adenosine for Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: February 3, 2021
Treatment strategies in severe symptomatic carotid and coronary artery disease
Karolina Dzierwa1, Piotr Pieniazek, Piotr Musialek
1Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland. kdzierwa@gmail.com
Insights
Treating severe carotid stenosis and coronary artery disease together involves risks. Hybrid approaches like carotid artery stenting and bypass grafting show promise, but more research is needed.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Coexistent severe carotid stenosis (CS) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is common.
- Approximately 20% of patients with multivessel CAD have severe CS, and 80% of patients referred for carotid revascularization have CAD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and compare treatment strategies for patients with concomitant severe CS and CAD.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of established and emerging revascularization techniques.
Main Methods:
- Literature search of MEDLINE using terms: carotid artery stenting (CAS), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), carotid endarterectomy (CEA), stroke, myocardial infarction (MI).
- Review of treatment outcomes including major adverse events (MAE): death, stroke, or MI.
Main Results:
- Traditional CEA-CABG (simultaneous or staged) has a high MAE rate of 10-12%.
- Sequential CAS followed by CABG shows reduced MAE (≈7%), often with a delay due to antiplatelet therapy.
- One-stage hybrid CAS-CABG demonstrates the lowest MAE (1.4-4.5%) with modified antiplatelet regimens and off-pump CABG.
Conclusions:
- Established CEA-CABG carries significant risks.
- Hybrid revascularization (CAS-CABG) is an emerging, potentially safer option for CS-CAD.
- Further multi-center randomized trials are necessary to validate hybrid approaches and guide widespread adoption.
Abstract:
Coexistent carotid artery stenosis (CS) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is not infrequent. One in 5 patients with multivessel CAD has a severe CS, and CAD incidence reaches 80% in those referred for carotid revascularization. We reviewed treatment strategies for concomitant severe CS and CAD. We performed a literature search (MEDLINE) with terms including carotid artery stenting (CAS), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), carotid endarterectomy (CEA), stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI). The main therapeutic option for CS-CAD has been (simultaneous or staged) CEA-CABG. This, however, is associated with a high risk of MI (in those with CEA prior to CABG) or stroke (CABG prior to CEA), and the cumulative major adverse event rate (MAE - death, stroke or MI) reaches 10-12%. With increasing adoption of CAS, a sequential strategy of CAS followed by CABG has emerged. Registries (usually single-centre) indicate an MAE rate of ≈7% for CAS followed by CABG (frequently after >30 days, due to double antiplatelet therapy). Recently, 1-stage CAS-CABG has been introduced. This involves different antiplatelet regimens and, in some centers, preferred off-pump CABG, with a cumulative MAE of 1.4-4.5%. No randomized trial comparing different treatment strategies in CS-CAD has been conducted, and thus far reported series are prone to selection/reporting bias. In addition to the established surgical treatment (CEA-CABG, sequential/simultaneous), hybrid revascularization (CAS-CABG) is emerging as a viable therapeutic option. Larger, preferably multi-centre, studies are required before this can become widely applied.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures