Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Relative Velocity in One Dimension01:10

Relative Velocity in One Dimension

The understanding of the concept of reference frames is essential to discuss relative motion in one or more dimensions. When we say that an object has a certain velocity, we must state the velocity with respect to a given reference frame. In most examples, this reference frame has been Earth. For instance, if a statement reads that a person is sitting in a train moving at 10 m/s east, then it implies that the person on the train is moving relative to the surface of Earth at this velocity,...
Kinematic Equations - II01:17

Kinematic Equations - II

The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
Echo01:06

Echo

The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
Inertial Frames of Reference01:03

Inertial Frames of Reference

Newton’s first law is usually considered to be a statement about reference frames. It provides a method for identifying a special type of reference frame: the inertial reference frame. In principle, we can make the net force on a body zero. If its velocity relative to a given frame is constant, then that frame is said to be inertial. So, by definition, an inertial reference frame is a reference frame where Newton's first law holds valid. Newton's first law applies to objects with constant...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intraoperative upper urinary tract cytology examination is a risk factor of upper urinary tract recurrence in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Urologic oncology·2020
Same author

Long-Term Outcomes After Sublobar Resection Versus Lobectomy in Patients With Clinical Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma Meeting the Node-Negative Criteria Defined by High-Resolution Computed Tomography and [<sup>18</sup>F]-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-d-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography.

Clinical lung cancer·2020
Same author

Clinical Impacts of EGFR Mutation Status: Analysis of 5780 Surgically Resected Lung Cancer Cases.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2020
Same author

Influence of Warfarin Therapy on Prothrombin Production and Its Posttranslational Modifications.

The journal of applied laboratory medicine·2020
Same author

Wedge resection as an alternative treatment for octogenarian and older patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Japanese journal of clinical oncology·2020
Same author

Analysis of targeted somatic mutations in pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung using next-generation sequencing technique.

Thoracic cancer·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

Self-motion perception compresses time experienced in return travel.

Takeharu Seno1, Hiroyuki Ito, Sunaga Shoji

  • 1Faculty of Design, Kyushu University, 4-9-1 Shiobaru, Minami-ku, Fukuoka 815-8540, Japan. seno@design.kyushu-u.ac.jp

Perception
|August 3, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Travel time feels shorter when returning to a familiar location compared to traveling to a new one. This study experimentally confirms that self-motion perception makes return journeys seem quicker than they actually are.

More Related Videos

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes
09:27

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes
09:27

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Anecdotal evidence suggests perceived travel time differs between outward and return journeys.
  • The subjective experience of time during motion is a complex phenomenon.
  • Previous research has not experimentally quantified this temporal discrepancy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally investigate the subjective experience of time during outward versus return travel.
  • To determine if return travel time is perceived as shorter than outward travel time.
  • To identify the underlying perceptual mechanisms, specifically self-motion perception, responsible for this effect.

Main Methods:

  • Participants undertook both outward and return journeys under controlled experimental conditions.
  • Objective travel duration was recorded and compared with subjective time estimations.
  • Experimental manipulations focused on isolating the contribution of self-motion perception.

Main Results:

  • Experimental results confirm that return travel time is subjectively experienced as shorter than actual travel time.
  • A significant discrepancy between perceived and actual time was observed during return journeys.
  • Self-motion perception was identified as the primary factor inducing this temporal distortion.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides the first experimental evidence for the subjective shortening of return travel time.
  • Self-motion perception plays a critical role in modulating the experience of time during familiar journeys.
  • These findings have implications for understanding human spatial cognition and temporal perception.