Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Comparing the costs of alternative models of end-of-life care
Tom McBride1, Alec Morton, Andy Nichols
1National Audit Office, 157-197 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 9SP, UK. tom.mcbride@nao.gsi.gov.uk
Objectives:
This study explores the financial consequences of decreased acute care utilization and expanded community-based care for patients at the end of life in England.
Method:
A Markov model based on cost and utilization data was used to estimate the costs of care for cancer and organ failure in the last year of life and to simulate reduced acute care utilization.
Results:
We estimated at pounds 1.8 billion the cost to the taxpayer of care for the 127,000 patients dying from cancer in 2006. The equivalent cost for the 30,000 people dying from organ failure was pounds 553 million. Resources of pounds 16 to pounds 171 million could be released for cancer.
Conclusion:
People generally prefer to die outside hospital. Our results suggest that reducing reliance on acute care could release resources and better meet peoples' preferences. Better data on the cost-effectiveness of interventions are required. Similar models would be useful to decision-makers evaluating changes in service provision.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Continuing Care
Cancer Survival Analysis

