Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Non-invasive Assessment of Microvascular and Endothelial Function
Published on: January 29, 2013
Central hemodynamics and cardiovascular risk in nondippers
Cameron T Coleman1, Michael Stowasser, Carly Jenkins
1Menzies Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Abstract:
Failure of blood pressure (BP) to decline appropriately overnight (nondipping) is associated with increased risk. This may be due to inappropriately raised supine central BP and this study's first aim was to examine this hypothesis. Secondly, aortic stiffness, central hemodynamics, and left ventricular (LV) mass were measured as other possible mechanisms of higher risk. Brachial and central BP (supine and seated), aortic stiffness, central hemodynamics, and LV dimensions were measured in 95 patients with hypertension (mean age 62 ± 8 standard deviation). Central hemodynamics were recorded by combined radial tonometry and 3-dimensional echocardiography. Seated brachial and central systolic BP (SBP) were similar between dippers (n = 52) and nondippers (n = 43). However, nondippers had higher supine brachial (132 ± 14 mm Hg vs 126 ± 11 mm Hg; P = .029) and central (121 ± 15 mm Hg vs 115 ± 11 mm Hg; P = .024) SBP. Aortic stiffness was not different between groups (P = .76), but LV mass index (33.0 ± 6.2 vs 29.4±7.2 g/m(2.7) ; P=.019), stroke volume index (30.2 ± 6.2 mL/m(2) vs 27.4 ± 6.0 mL/m(2) ; P = .040), and LV stroke work (3246 ± 815 mm Hg/mL/m(2) vs 2778 ± 615 mm Hg/mL/m(2) ; P = .005) were all higher in nondippers. Dipper status independently predicted LV mass index (β = 3.61; P = .001). Nondippers have higher supine brachial and central SBP, significantly different central hemodynamics, and elevated LV mass index compared with dippers. These cardiovascular anomalies possibly contribute to increased mortality risk.
Related Concept Videos
Chronopharmacokinetics: Circadian Rhythms and Influence on Drug Response
The time of drug administration is an important factor to consider, as it can influence the toxic dose of a drug. For example, a study conducted by Prins et al. in 1997 examined the effects of the timing of...
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Measurement of Blood Pressure
