Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Critical Thinking01:19

Critical Thinking

Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Critical Thinking I01:24

Critical Thinking I

Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career with...
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Insurers, behave yourselves: TMA pushes national code of conduct.

Texas medicine·2014
Same author

TMA practice consulting will change you for the better.

Texas medicine·2014
Same author

Saving lives through education.

Texas medicine·2014
Same author

Aetna to pay up.

Texas medicine·2013
Same author

Real meaningful use.

Texas medicine·2013
Same author

Part of the team.

Texas medicine·2013
Same journal

Commentary: This Is Not a Drill.

Texas medicine·2021
Same journal

Healthy Determination: Texas Physicians are Finding Better Ways to Address Their Patients' Social Determinants of Health.

Texas medicine·2021
Same journal

Going Local: Accountable Health Organizations Could Help Combat Social Disparities at the Local Level.

Texas medicine·2021
Same journal

Data Driven: Medicaid's Inspector General Focuses on Fraud Prevention, Not Just Prosecution.

Texas medicine·2021
Same journal

Talk to Patients About: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

Texas medicine·2021
Same journal

Obstacles to Clear.

Texas medicine·2021
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum
07:36

Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum

Published on: March 12, 2018

Healthy debate.

Crystal Conde

    Texas Medicine
    |August 3, 2011
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Physicians supported Texas legislation to reduce vaccine-preventable diseases, improve cancer prevention, and curb obesity. These public health initiatives aim to lower healthcare costs and disease burden across the state.

    More Related Videos

    Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
    06:42

    Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

    Published on: September 28, 2018

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 30, 2026

    Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum
    07:36

    Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum

    Published on: March 12, 2018

    Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
    06:42

    Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

    Published on: September 28, 2018

    Area of Science:

    • Public Health
    • Health Policy
    • Preventive Medicine

    Background:

    • Physicians and public health organizations identified key areas for legislative action in Texas.
    • Legislation was proposed to address significant public health challenges including vaccine-preventable diseases, cancer, smoking, and obesity.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To advocate for and support the passage of Texas legislation aimed at improving public health outcomes.
    • To reduce the incidence and burden of major diseases through policy interventions.
    • To decrease healthcare costs associated with preventable conditions.

    Main Methods:

    • Advocacy for legislative bills by physician groups and public health coalitions.
    • Support for budget-conscious legislative measures during the Texas session.

    Main Results:

    • Physician advocacy focused on decreasing vaccine-preventable disease.
    • Legislation aimed to bolster cancer prevention and research efforts.
    • Proposed bills sought to protect citizens from secondhand smoke and combat obesity.

    Conclusions:

    • The passage of this legislation is expected to decrease the overall burden of disease in Texas.
    • Supported bills are anticipated to reduce healthcare expenditures.
    • The initiatives represent a proactive approach to enhancing public health and well-being.