Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

Psychology as a Science

Psychology as a Science

Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Increased burden of invasive group A streptococcal disease among Australian children, 2023-2024: a prospective cohort study.

The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific·2026

Same author

Antibody responses against bacterial glycans affinity mature and diversify in germinal centers.

Immunity·2026

Same author

Continued High Levels of Invasive Streptococcus pyogenes Infections in Belgian Children Under 5 Years: Exploring Different Contributing Factors.

The Pediatric infectious disease journal·2026

Same author

Clinical decision rules for diagnosis of Streptococcus pyogenes sore throat in Fiji: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific·2025

Same author

Invasive and urinary tract infections in febrile neonates in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis.

European journal of pediatrics·2025

Same author

Publisher Correction: Early-life serological profiles and the development of natural protective humoral immunity to Streptococcus pyogenes in a high-burden setting.

Nature medicine·2025

Same journal

The lncRNA-m6A axis in cancer: a bidirectional regulatory network in tumor progression and therapeutic resistance.

Journal of translational medicine·2026

Same journal

Repurposing cepharanthine as a radiosensitizer in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through dual metabolic intervention and direct targeting of p70s6K.

Journal of translational medicine·2026

Same journal

Cellular crosstalk and signaling networks in the rheumatoid arthritis synovial microenvironment.

Journal of translational medicine·2026

Same journal

Pilot spatial transcriptomics of dental pulpitis suggests immune-fibroblast profiling linked to reversibility.

Journal of translational medicine·2026

Same journal

Beyond semen analysis: in men with normal semen parameters telomere attrition and oxidative imbalance distinguish those fertile from those with infertility.

Journal of translational medicine·2026

Same journal

Dual-block HER2 assessment reveals clinically relevant intratumoral heterogeneity in gynecologic cancers: a single-center landscape analysis.

Journal of translational medicine·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Science that "knows" and science that "asks".

Pierre R Smeesters, Marie Deghorain, Andrew C Steer

Journal of Translational Medicine

|August 4, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Clinician-researchers and experimental scientists face communication barriers due to differing professional environments and research goals. Addressing these differences is crucial for advancing multidisciplinary translational medicine research.

More Related Videos

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Area of Science:

Multidisciplinary research
Translational medicine
Scientific communication

Background:

Clinician-researchers and experimental scientists operate in distinct professional spheres.
Divergent research objectives and methodologies create communication challenges.

Discussion:

Misunderstandings arise from differing terminologies and research priorities.
These communication gaps hinder effective collaboration in complex scientific fields.

Key Insights:

Stereotypical representations can illuminate communication barriers.
Recognizing these differences is the first step toward improving interdisciplinary dialogue.

Outlook:

Fostering a shared understanding is essential for successful translational research.
Encouraging open debate can bridge the gap between clinical and experimental science.