Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 23, 2011
Direct access midwifery booking for prenatal care and its role in Down syndrome screening
Tariq S Nawaz1, Gillian M Tringham, Stephen Holding
1Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK.
Objective:
To compare the uptake of Down syndrome screening by women following referral by direct access and general practitioner (GP) modes.
Methods:
The method of referral by either GP or direct access, for women who booked into prenatal care in Hull and East Yorkshire in 2010, was analysed using data collected from the Protos database at the Women and Children's Hospital, Hull. Subsequently, the uptake of first and second trimester screening for Down syndrome was reviewed by combining the Protos database to the screening data collected by the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory at Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull.
Results:
Women booked into prenatal care significantly earlier when referred by GP in comparison to direct access with a significant difference in screening uptake of 49.5 and 42.7%, respectively. The ratio of uptake between first and second trimester screening was not significantly different.
Conclusions:
Further research on the new direct access method of referral is required, as it may have a role in the uptake of prenatal screening for Down syndrome. More time is needed to show a definitive effect.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Preventive Healthcare Services

