Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
Single-tooth implants with different neck designs: a randomized clinical trial evaluating the aesthetic outcome
Laurens den Hartog1, Gerry M Raghoebar, James J Huddleston Slater
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. l.den.hartog@kchir.umcg.nl
Aim:
To evaluate the aesthetic outcome of single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone with different neck designs from a professional's and patient's perception.
Materials And Methods:
Ninety-three patients with a missing anterior tooth in the maxilla were randomly assigned to be treated with an implant with a smooth neck, a rough neck with grooves or a scalloped rough neck with grooves. Implants were installed in healed sites. One year after definitive crown placement (18 months post-implant placement), photographs were taken and the aesthetic outcome was assessed according to two objective aesthetic indexes: pink esthetic score/white esthetic score (PES/WES) and implant crown aesthetic index (ICAI). A questionnaire was used to assess the aesthetic outcome and general satisfaction from a patient's perception. standardized radiographs were taken to measure marginal bone level changes.
Results:
One implant was lost. Although there was a significant difference in marginal bone loss between the different implant neck designs (smooth neck 1.19±0.82mm, rough neck 0.90±0.57mm, scalloped neck 2.01±0.77mm), there were no differences in aesthetic outcome. According to the professional's assessments using PES/WES and ICAI, 79.3% and 62% of the cases showed acceptable crown aesthetics, and 59.8% and 56.5% of the cases showed acceptable mucosa aesthetics. Overall, patients were satisfied about the aesthetics of the mucosa (81.5%) and crown (93.3%), and general patient satisfaction was high (9.0±1.0 out of a maximum of 10). According to the professional's assessment, a pre-implant augmentation procedure was associated with less favorable aesthetics of the mucosa.
Conclusion:
This study shows that the aesthetics of single-tooth implants in the maxillary aesthetic zone appears to be independent of the implant neck designs applied but dependent on the need for pre-implant surgery.