Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Fabricating van der Waals Heterostructures with Precise Rotational Alignment
Published on: July 5, 2019
Interlayer coupling in EuS/SrS, EuS/PbSe and EuS/PbTe magnetic semiconductor superlattices
H Kępa1, C F Majkrzak, A Sipatov
1Institute of Experimental Physics, 69 Hoża Street, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland. Physics Department, Oregon State University, 301 Weniger Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Abstract:
Neutron reflectivity studies of EuS/SrS, EuS/PbSe and EuS/PbTe all-semiconductor superlattices were carried out in a search for exchange interlayer coupling. A relatively weak antiferromagnetic coupling was found in EuS/SrS and EuS/PbSe systems but no interlayer coupling was detected in EuS/PbTe superlattices. In EuS/SrS, where the SrS spacer is an insulator (E(g)≈4 eV), a very weak and short range interlayer coupling is in agreement with the earlier theoretical predictions that the interlayer coupling strength in EuS-based magnetic semiconductor superlattices depends strongly on the energy gap of the nonmagnetic layer and should decrease with an increase of the energy gap of the spacer material. A weak coupling in EuS/PbSe and no coupling in EuS/PbTe, where both PbSe and PbTe are narrow-gap semiconductors (E(g)≈0.3 eV), is in disagreement not only with the theoretical expectations but also in stark contrast with earlier results for another narrow-gap spacer system, EuS/PbS, where pronounced antiferromagnetic coupling persists even in samples with PbS layer thicknesses as large as 200 Å. A possible influence of the increasing lattice mismatch between EuS and the spacer materials (0.5%, 0.8%, 2.5% and 8.2% for PbS, SrS, PbSe and PbTe, respectively) on the magnetic ordering of the EuS layer near the interfaces and, consequently, on the interlayer coupling is discussed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Biasing of Metal-Semiconductor Junctions
In Schottky junctions, where the semiconductor is n-type, applying a positive voltage to the metal relative to the semiconductor reduces its Fermi...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

