Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
Deconstructing hermes: a critique of the hermeneutic turn in psychoanalysis
1Graduate Professional School, Toronto, Canada. psychologist@sympatico.ca
Abstract:
In this brief essay, I attempt to critique some of the philosophical problematics inherent with the hermeneutic turn in psychoanalysis. The proposition that "there are only interpretations of interpretations" leads to an inescapable circularity because interpretation ultimately lacks a referent or criterion for which to anchor meaning. If we follow this proposition through to its logical end, this ultimately collapses into relativism because meaning is relative to its interpretive scheme, which further relies on other interpretative schemata for which there are no definitive definitions, conclusive consensus, or universal laws governing interpretation. How can hermeneutics escape the charge of circularity, infinite regress, disavowal of universals, its tacit relativism, and the failure to provide a consensus or criteria for interpretation? How is psychoanalysis able to philosophically justify interpretative truth claims when they potentially inhere to a recalcitrant subjectivism while claiming to be objectively valuative?
Related Concept Videos
Horney's Sociocultural Approach
Humanistic Psychology
This approach...
Jung's Analytical Theory
Psychodynamic Therapy
Freudian Psychology
Structure of Self
Components of the Mind: Id, Ego, and Superego

