Comparing pneumococcal conjugate vaccine schedules based on 3 and 2 primary doses: systematic review and

Pippa Scott1, Anne W S Rutjes, Lilian Bermetz

  • 1Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Switzerland.

Vaccine
|August 9, 2011
PubMed

Insights

Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) schedules with 3 primary doses generally show higher antibody levels than 2-dose schedules. Clinical outcomes are not yet well-established for PCV schedule comparisons.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Vaccinology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) were initially implemented with 3 primary infant doses and a booster.
  • Understanding the impact of different PCV dosing schedules is crucial for optimizing vaccine efficacy and public health strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze evidence on the effects of different pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) schedules.
  • To compare immunological, nasopharyngeal carriage, and clinical outcomes between various PCV dosing regimens.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort, and case-control studies.
  • Searched 12 databases and trial registers up to March 2010 for studies comparing PCV schedules with 2 or 3 primary doses, with or without a booster.
  • Extracted data on clinical, carriage, and immunological outcomes; meta-analysis used where appropriate.

Main Results:

  • Both 3-dose (3p) and 2-dose (2p) PCV schedules induce high seropositivity levels for most serotypes.
  • Differences in seropositivity between 3p and 2p schedules were generally small, favoring 3p, particularly for serotypes 6B and 23F.
  • Limited evidence suggests a potential reduction in nasopharyngeal carriage with 3p+0 compared to 2p+0 schedules; no RCTs reported clinical outcomes for direct PCV schedule comparisons.

Conclusions:

  • Current data predominantly focus on immunological outcomes of PCV schedules, with both 2p and 3p regimens yielding high seropositivity.
  • The clinical significance of observed immunological differences between PCV schedules remains unknown.
  • A significant gap exists in RCT data directly comparing the clinical outcomes of different 2p versus 3p PCV schedules.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children01:29

Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

Pediatric patient dosages diverge from adults due to disparities in body surface area, total body water, and extracellular fluid per kilogram of body weight. The dosing regimen considers the variations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacology across distinct age groups, encompassing preterm newborns, infants, young children, older children, and adolescents. Calculation of pediatric patient doses is predicated on determining body surface area, which exhibits a superior correlation with the child's...
Dosage Interval and Administration Route: Determination Methods01:19

Dosage Interval and Administration Route: Determination Methods

A medication’s effectiveness largely depends on its appropriate dosage and the route of administration. Dosage ensures that a sufficient drug concentration is maintained in the bloodstream to elicit the desired therapeutic effect without causing toxicity. The route of administration affects the drug's bioavailability, rate of absorption, and onset of action, which are crucial for achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes. Drug dosage calculations are critical to tailoring therapy to individual...
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches01:28

Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches

Designing a dosage regimen, which refers to the manner of drug administration, is a complex process involving the selection of drug dose, route, and frequency. This process is underpinned by pharmacokinetic parameters derived from tests and population averages. These parameters are then tailored to patient-specific variables such as diagnosis, demographics, and allergy status. Once therapy commences, therapeutic response monitoring is critical and achieved through clinical and physical...
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses01:25

Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses

A loading dose is an essential pharmacological strategy to rapidly achieve the target plasma drug concentration necessary for an immediate therapeutic effect. This approach is especially critical for drugs characterized by slow absorption or extended half-lives, where delaying therapeutic plasma levels could compromise treatment outcomes. By administering a loading dose, clinicians ensure a prompt onset of drug action, even for agents with complex pharmacokinetic profiles.Achieving steady-state...
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters01:01

Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters

It is not uncommon for complete drug pharmacokinetic profiles to remain elusive in pharmacokinetics. This necessitates certain educated assumptions by pharmacokineticists to determine appropriate dosage regimens without comprehensive pharmacokinetic data from animal or human studies. One prevalent assumption is setting the bioavailability factor, denoted as F, to 1 or 100%. This assumption caters to the scenario where a drug doesn't achieve full systemic absorption, resulting in the patient...