Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm worthwhile?

J G Russell1

  • 1St Mary's Hospital, Manchester.

Clinical Radiology
|March 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the Congenital and Hereditary Transmissions of Diseases and Pathological Peculiarities, Especially Those of the Human Teeth; an Inaugural Thesis Respectfully Submitted to the Faculty of the Baltimore College of Dental Surgery, for the Degree of Doctor of Dental Surgery, February 20th, 1858.

The American journal of dental science·2019
Same author

Drip infusion cholangiography.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine·2010
Same author

Introductory notes regarding a European Medical Risk Related History questionnaire (EMMRH) designed for use in dental practice.

British dental journal·1998
Same author

Should the immediate IVU film be abandoned in the interests of dose reduction?

Clinical radiology·1995
Same author

Pregnancy and ionising radiation.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1992
Same author

New risks, new doses.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·1992
Same journal

Diagnostic accuracy of flat panel computed tomography for acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Nuclear medicine techniques in gynaecological malignancy: a review of best practice.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning reconstruction dual-energy computed tomography for gastrointestinal system tumors: low-kiloelectron volt imaging vs routine imaging.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based reconstruction for 5.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of image quality and diagnostic efficacy.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Papillary muscle fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a pictorial review of causes, diagnostic challenges and practical pearls.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based automated assessment of pulmonary artery indices and surgical approach triage for tetralogy of Fallot from multicenter cardiac computed tomography (CT).

Clinical radiology·2026
See all related articles

This study calculates the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms, finding it comparable to other screening programs. The analysis indicates that screening both men and women is recommended for optimal health outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Medical Economics
  • Vascular Surgery

Background:

  • Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a significant cause of mortality.
  • Screening programs aim to detect AAA early for timely intervention.
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis is crucial for resource allocation in healthcare.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) for an AAA ultrasound screening program.
  • To compare the cost-effectiveness of AAA screening with other established screening initiatives.
  • To evaluate the impact of age and sex on the cost-effectiveness of AAA screening.

Main Methods:

  • Economic modeling to calculate program costs.
  • Estimation of QALYs gained through screening and early treatment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the findings across different parameters.

    • Main Results:

    • The cost per QALY for AAA ultrasound screening was calculated for various age and sex demographics.
    • The economic value of the AAA screening program was found to be competitive with other public health screening interventions.
    • Inclusion of both men and women in the screening program was found to be cost-effective.

    Conclusions:

    • Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm offers a cost-effective approach to reducing mortality.
    • The cost-effectiveness of AAA screening supports its implementation in broader public health strategies.
    • Screening programs should encompass both male and female populations to maximize public health benefits.