Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Understanding Memory01:19

Understanding Memory

Memory is the retention of information or experiences over time, facilitated through three main processes: encoding, storage, and retrieval. Encoding is the process of inputting information into the memory system. For instance, when listening to a lecture, watching a play, reading a book, or having a conversation, the brain is actively encoding information. This initial stage involves transforming sensory input into a form that can be processed and stored by the brain. Various factors, such as...
Encoding01:19

Encoding

Information enters the brain through encoding, which is the input of information into the memory system. Once sensory information is received from the environment, the brain labels or codes it. The information is then organized with similar information and connected to existing concepts. Encoding occurs through automatic processing and effortful processing.
Automatic processing involves the encoding of details like time, space, frequency, and the meaning of words, usually done without conscious...
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Impact of Schemas01:30

Impact of Schemas

Schemas are cognitive structures that provide a framework for interpreting and organizing social information. They help individuals navigate complex environments by offering expectations about people, events, and behaviors. Schemas influence attention, encoding, and retrieval processes, thereby shaping the entire trajectory of information processing in social contexts.Attention and Cognitive LoadDuring initial attention, schemas function as filters that prioritize schema-consistent information,...
Retrieval01:12

Retrieval

Retrieval is the process of getting information out of memory storage and back into conscious awareness. This ability is essential for daily tasks like brushing hair and teeth, driving to work, and performing job duties. Retrieval occurs in three ways: recall, recognition, and relearning.
Recall involves accessing information without cues, such as during an essay test, where individuals must retrieve facts and concepts from memory unaided. Another example is remembering the name of a colleague...
Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory01:22

Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory

Improving short-term memory can be achieved through techniques like chunking and rehearsal. Chunking involves organizing information into larger, more manageable units. This technique is particularly useful for information that exceeds the typical memory span of between five and nine items. For instance, logging into an online account with a password like "ta89vq0179gz" involves grouping letters and numbers into three chunks—ta89, vq01, and 79gz. It makes large amounts of information more...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Safety of Cholecystectomy in Nonagenarians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Kernel-based maximum likelihood reconstruction of attenuation and activity (MLAA) in SPECT imaging for improved attenuation correction and activity quantification: simulation, phantom and patient validation studies.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

A Complete Grocery Pick-and-Pack Application Using a Computationally Lightweight Vision-Based Mobile Manipulator.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Inequities in Antiretroviral Therapy Costs for Pregnant Women and Pregnant People in Canada.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC·2026
Same author

Characterizing Hydrated Polymers via Dielectric Relaxation Spectroscopy: Connecting Relative Permittivity, State of Water, and Salt Transport Properties of Sulfonated Polysulfones.

Macromolecules·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

Memory as discrimination: a challenge to the encoding-retrieval match principle.

Marie Poirier1, James S Nairne, Caroline Morin

  • 1Memory Research Unit, Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, City University London, London, England, UK. m.poirier@city.ac.uk

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|August 10, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Retrieval performance depends on cue distinctiveness, not just encoding-retrieval match. Increasing match can hinder recall if cue diagnostic value decreases, challenging general retrieval hypotheses.

More Related Videos

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion
15:57

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion
15:57

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Existing theories propose encoding-retrieval match or cue distinctiveness as key to memory recall.
  • Understanding retrieval efficiency is crucial for memory research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To contrast a general encoding-retrieval match hypothesis with a cue distinctiveness view.
  • To investigate the causal factors influencing retrieval efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments employed cued-recognition tasks after a learning phase.
  • Manipulated cue-target uniqueness (diagnostic value) and cue overlap.
  • Measured response time as the primary performance indicator.

Main Results:

  • Increasing encoding-retrieval match can impair performance by reducing cue diagnostic value.
  • Encoding-retrieval match alone did not determine retrieval effectiveness.
  • Performance changes varied: no change, increase, or decrease with increased match.

Conclusions:

  • Cue diagnostic value, not merely encoding-retrieval match, is critical for effective retrieval.
  • The findings challenge the sufficiency of a general encoding-retrieval match hypothesis.
  • Memory retrieval is influenced by a complex interplay of factors, including cue distinctiveness.