Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy
Published on: May 1, 2020
Anal acoustic reflectometry: a new reproducible technique providing physiological assessment of anal sphincter
Peter J Mitchell1, Niels Klarskov, Karen J Telford
1Pelvic Floor Service, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital South Manchester NHS Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom. peter.mitchell40@btopenworld.com
Background:
Anal acoustic reflectometry is a new technique of assessing anal sphincter function. Five new variables reflecting anal canal function are measured: the opening and closing pressure, the opening and closing elastance, and hysteresis.
Objective:
This study aimed to compare the reproducibility of this new technique, in terms of test-retest and interrater reliability, with manometry, the current standard test of sphincter function.
Design:
This is a comparative study of reproducibility between anal acoustic reflectometry and manometry.
Settings:
This study was conducted at a university hospital (outpatient clinic and endoscopy unit).
Patients:
Twenty-six (21 female) subjects were assessed with both anal acoustic reflectometry and manometry on 2 separate occasions (test-retest reliability) and 22 (16 female) subjects were assessed with both methods by 2 separate investigators (interrater reliability).
Main Outcome Measures:
Reproducibility was assessed according to the Bland-Altman method.
Results:
All of the measured novel anal acoustic reflectometry parameters had acceptable mean differences and repeatability coefficients. Comparison of the 2 methods of sphincter assessment (anal acoustic reflectometry vs manometry) was made for measurements taken at rest and during voluntary contraction. There was no significant difference in terms of test-retest reliability between the manometry maximum resting pressure vs the reflectometry opening pressure (P = .57) or manometry maximum squeeze pressure vs the reflectometry squeeze opening pressure (P = .68). No significant difference between methods was found in interrater reliability during assessments at rest (P = .62) and voluntary contraction (P = .96).
Limitations:
Anal acoustic reflectometry is limited, as with all tests of anorectal function, in that the device is placed within the anal canal, causing stimulation of sensory and stretch receptors.
Conclusions:
Anal acoustic reflectometry has a reproducibility comparable to manometry in terms of both test-retest and interrater reliability. Anal acoustic reflectometry is a promising technique that allows an assessment of anal canal physiology that is not available with manometry.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Assessing Body Temperature - Rectal
Follow these steps for rectal temperature assessment:
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don clean gloves to prevent cross-infection.
Step 2: Position the patient in a side-lying position to better visualize the rectal...
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...

