Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)-Based Rapid Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection and Antibiotic Resistance
Published on: July 28, 2023
Reliability of Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection
S Redéen1, F Petersson, E Törnkrantz
1Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden.
Abstract:
Introduction. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is very common worldwide. A reliable diagnosis is crucial for patients with H. pylori-related diseases. At followup, it is important to confirm that eradication therapy has been successful. There is no established gold standard for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. Material and Methods. A sample of 304 volunteers from the general population was screened for H. pylori infection with serology, (13)C-urea breath test (UBT), rapid urease test (RUT) on fresh biopsy, culture from biopsy, and histological examination. Culture was used as gold standard. Results. The sensitivity was 0.99 for serology, 0.90 for UBT, 0.90 for RUT, and 0.90 for histological examination. Corresponding specificities were 0.82, 0.99, 0.98, and 0.97, respectively. The accuracy was 0.86 for serology, 0.96 for UBT, 0.95 for RUT, 0.93 for culture, and 0.95 for histology. There was a strong correlation between the results of UBT and the histological scores of H. pylori colonisation as well as between the results of UBT and the scores of RUT. Conclusion. There were only minor differences in accuracy between the three invasive tests for H. pylori infection in this population. RUT may be recommended as the first choice since a result is obtained within hours. The accuracy of UBT was comparable to the invasive tests, and it is recommended for situations when endoscopy is not needed.
Insights
Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection is vital. The rapid urease test (RUT) and 13C-urea breath test (UBT) show high accuracy, comparable to invasive methods, making them excellent choices for H. pylori detection.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Microbiology
- Diagnostic Medicine
Background:
- Helicobacter pylori infection is globally prevalent.
- Accurate diagnosis is essential for managing H. pylori-related conditions and confirming treatment success.
- No definitive gold standard currently exists for H. pylori diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of various H. pylori detection methods.
- To identify the most reliable and practical diagnostic approach for H. pylori infection.
Main Methods:
- A study involving 304 volunteers screened using serology, 13C-urea breath test (UBT), rapid urease test (RUT), biopsy culture, and histology.
- Culture was utilized as the gold standard for comparison.
Main Results:
- Serology demonstrated 99% sensitivity and 82% specificity (0.86 accuracy).
- UBT (90% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 0.96 accuracy), RUT (90% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 0.95 accuracy), and histology (90% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 0.95 accuracy) showed high diagnostic performance.
- Strong correlations were observed between UBT results and histological/RUT scores.
Conclusions:
- Invasive tests (RUT, histology) exhibited minor accuracy differences.
- RUT is recommended as a first-line test due to rapid results.
- UBT offers comparable accuracy to invasive methods and is suitable when endoscopy is not required.
More Related Videos
04:56Detection of Helicobacter pylori Infection and Antibiotic Resistance via Stool Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis
Published on: May 16, 2025
03:33Rapid Detection of Fecal Antigen of Helicobacter pylori Infection Based on Double Antibody Sandwich Detection Technology
Published on: May 23, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Gastritis II: Pathophysiology
Peptic Ulcer
Peptic Ulcer Disease II: Pathophysiology
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test