Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026
09:06
Evaluation of the Curing of Adhesive Systems by Rheological and Thermal Testing
Published on: July 3, 2020
A comparative analysis of adhesive resin removal methods
Courtney Schiefelbein1, Kevin Rowland
1Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
International Journal of Orthodontics (Milwaukee, Wis.)
|August 11, 2011
Summary
For effective bracket adhesive removal, Sof-Lex discs proved superior to other methods like pliers and carbide burs. This technique minimizes surface damage, offering results comparable to no removal.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontic materials science
- Dental restorative techniques
Background:
- Bracket debonding requires effective adhesive removal.
- Incomplete removal can damage enamel and affect aesthetics.
- Various methods exist, but their comparative efficacy is debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of four distinct bracket adhesive removal techniques.
- To identify the optimal method for minimizing enamel damage during adhesive removal.
Main Methods:
- Investigated four removal methods: adhesive removing pliers, 12-fluted carbide burs, white stone, and Sof-Lex discs.
- Utilized scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for microanalysis and high-resolution imaging.
- Compared SEM findings against a negative control group (no removal).
Main Results:
- Sof-Lex discs demonstrated the most effective adhesive removal.
- The efficacy of Sof-Lex discs was comparable to the negative control group.
- Other tested methods showed varying degrees of residual adhesive and surface alteration.
Conclusions:
- Sof-Lex discs are the most effective method for bracket adhesive removal.
- This technique offers a conservative approach, preserving enamel integrity.
- Clinicians should consider Sof-Lex discs for optimal debonding outcomes.
