Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Protocol for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Symptom Provocation to Treat Obsessive-compulsive Disorder
Published on: November 25, 2025
Developing abbreviated OHIP versions for use with TMD patients
M J van der Meulen1, M T John, M Naeije
1Department of Oral Kinesiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Research Institute MOVE, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Dutch Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-NL) and its 14-item version (OHIP-NL14) demonstrate strong reliability and validity for assessing temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients. The shorter OHIP-NL5 version is less suitable for clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Oral Health
- Psychometrics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) significantly impacts patients' quality of life.
- Accurate measurement of oral health impacts is crucial for clinical assessment and research in TMD.
- The Dutch Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-NL) is an established tool, but shorter versions may enhance clinical efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the psychometric properties of three versions of the Dutch Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-NL): the original 49-item version, and two newly developed abbreviated versions (OHIP-NL14 and OHIP-NL5).
- To determine the suitability of these versions for clinical use with patients diagnosed with temporomandibular disorders (TMD).
Main Methods:
- Development of OHIP-NL14 and OHIP-NL5 by item selection from the original OHIP-NL.
- Administration of the OHIP-NL versions and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) axis II questionnaire to 245 TMD patients.
- Comparison of reliability (internal consistency, test-retest) and validity of the three OHIP-NL versions, including associations with psychological variables.
Main Results:
- Internal consistency was sufficient for OHIP-NL and OHIP-NL14, but insufficient for OHIP-NL5.
- Test-retest reliability was excellent for OHIP-NL and OHIP-NL14, and fair to good for OHIP-NL5.
- All three versions demonstrated score validity, with statistically significant associations between OHIP summary scores and RDC/TMD axis II variables (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- The OHIP-NL and OHIP-NL14 exhibit comparable and robust psychometric characteristics, making them suitable for clinical application in TMD patient assessment.
- The OHIP-NL14 is recommended as a preferred alternative to the full OHIP-NL when questionnaire length is a consideration.
- The OHIP-NL5 is not recommended for clinical use due to insufficient internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
More Related Videos
08:07Traditional Trail Making Test Modified into Brand-new Assessment Tools: Digital and Walking Trail Making Test
Published on: November 23, 2019
14:28Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
Published on: May 10, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Overview and Classification
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Drug Delivery Systems: Different Types
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors