Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

A Method to Assess Fc-mediated Effector Functions Induced by Influenza Hemagglutinin Specific Antibodies
Published on: February 23, 2018
Extent of antigenic cross-reactivity among highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses
Mariette F Ducatez1, Zhipeng Cai, Malik Peiris
1Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105-3678, USA.
Abstract:
Highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses emerged in 1996 and have since evolved so extensively that a single strain can no longer be used as a prepandemic vaccine or diagnostic reagent. We therefore sought to identify the H5N1 strains that may best serve as cross-reactive diagnostic reagents. We compared the cross-reactivity of 27 viruses of clades 0, 1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 4 and of four computationally designed ancestral H5N1 strains by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (MN) assays. Antigenic cartography was used to analyze the large quantity of resulting data. Cartographs of HI titers with chicken red blood cells were similar to those of MN titers, but HI with horse red blood cells decreased antigenic distances among the H5N1 strains studied. Thus, HI with horse red blood cells seems to be the assay of choice for H5N1 diagnostics. Whereas clade 2.2 antigens were able to detect antibodies raised to most of the tested H5N1 viruses (and clade 2.2-specific antisera detected most of the H5N1 antigens), ancestral strain A exhibited the widest reactivity pattern and hence was the best candidate diagnostic reagent for broad detection of H5N1 strains.
Insights
Highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses have evolved, necessitating new diagnostic tools. Ancestral strain A demonstrated the broadest reactivity, making it the best candidate for detecting diverse H5N1 strains.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Immunology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses emerged in 1996 and have since evolved significantly.
- The extensive evolution of H5N1 strains prevents the use of a single strain for effective prepandemic vaccines or diagnostic reagents.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify H5N1 strains that can serve as effective cross-reactive diagnostic reagents.
- To evaluate the suitability of different H5N1 clades and computationally designed ancestral strains for broad H5N1 detection.
Main Methods:
- Compared the cross-reactivity of 27 H5N1 viruses (clades 0, 1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 4) and four computationally designed ancestral strains.
- Utilized hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (MN) assays to assess viral cross-reactivity.
- Employed antigenic cartography for data analysis.
Main Results:
- Antigenic cartographs generated from HI titers with chicken red blood cells were comparable to those from MN titers.
- HI assays using horse red blood cells reduced antigenic distances, suggesting it as a preferred method for H5N1 diagnostics.
- Clade 2.2 antigens showed broad antibody detection capabilities, while ancestral strain A exhibited the widest reactivity pattern among all tested strains.
Conclusions:
- Ancestral strain A is the most promising candidate for a broad-spectrum diagnostic reagent for H5N1 avian influenza.
- Hemagglutination inhibition with horse red blood cells is recommended as the assay of choice for H5N1 diagnostics due to its ability to discern antigenic relationships.
- The findings support the development of more effective H5N1 diagnostic tools capable of detecting diverse and evolving viral strains.
More Related Videos
07:15Preparation of Pseudo-Typed H5 Avian Influenza Viruses with Calcium Phosphate Transfection Method and Measurement of Antibody Neutralizing Activity
Published on: November 22, 2021
08:52Use of an Influenza Antigen Microarray to Measure the Breadth of Serum Antibodies Across Virus Subtypes
Published on: July 26, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cross-reactivity
Viral Recombination
Influenza
Antigens Involved in Adaptive Immunity
Complete Antigens
Complete antigens possess both immunogenicity and reactivity.