Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Screening for the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder phenotype using the strength and difficulties
Anne Karin Ullebø1, Maj-Britt Posserud, Einar Heiervang
1Unifob Health Department, RBUP Vest, 7810 Bergen, Norway. anne.ullebo@uni.no
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) hyperactivity-inattention subscale effectively screens for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) combined subtype. However, its sensitivity is lower for inattentive and hyperactive ADHD subtypes.
Area of Science:
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
- Mental Health Screening
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used child mental health screening tool.
- Previous research suggests the SDQ may be a useful screener for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) phenotype.
- The DSM-IV criteria provide a standardized framework for diagnosing ADHD subtypes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the screening properties of the SDQ hyperactivity-inattention subscale for the DSM-IV ADHD phenotype in a large population-based sample.
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the SDQ subscale using parent and teacher reports.
- To assess the SDQ's ability to identify different ADHD subtypes.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 6,233 children aged 7-9 years in Bergen, Norway.
- Parents and teachers completed questionnaires including the SDQ and the 18-item SNAP-IV ADHD symptom list.
- Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to determine the screening performance, with DSM-IV ADHD phenotype based on both informants as the gold standard.
Main Results:
- The SDQ hyperactivity-inattention subscale demonstrated strong screening performance, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.91 for parent reports and 0.95 for teacher reports.
- The SDQ predictive algorithm correctly identified 74% of children with the ADHD combined subtype.
- Sensitivity was lower for the ADHD inattentive (22%) and ADHD hyperactive subtypes, indicating limitations in detecting these presentations.
Conclusions:
- The 5-item SDQ hyperactivity-inattention subscale serves as a concise and effective screening tool for the ADHD combined subtype.
- While useful for general ADHD screening, clinicians should be aware of its lower sensitivity for the inattentive and hyperactive subtypes.
- The SDQ offers a practical alternative to longer ADHD symptom checklists, particularly when teacher ratings are available.
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings.
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in situations...

