Comparisons between murine polyomavirus and Simian virus 40 show significant differences in small T antigen function

Shaida Andrabi1, Justin H Hwang, Jennifer Kean Choe

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

Journal of Virology
|August 13, 2011
PubMed

Insights

Simian virus 40 small T antigen (SVST) and polyomavirus small T antigen (POLST) exhibit distinct functions in cell differentiation, survival, and transformation. SVST promotes cell cycle progression and transformation, while POLST inhibits differentiation and induces apoptosis.

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • Viral oncoproteins, like Simian virus 40 large T antigen (LT), can have diverse functions despite belonging to the same virus family.
  • SV40 small T antigen (SVST) is known for its role in human cell transformation.
  • Significant functional differences exist between SVST and polyomavirus small T antigen (POLST).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and delineate the distinct effects of SVST and POLST on cellular differentiation, transformation, and survival.
  • To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the functional divergence between SVST and POLST.
  • To compare the interactions of SVST and POLST with protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) and its subunits.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of SVST and POLST functions in cell cycle progression, differentiation, and apoptosis.
  • Assessment of SVST and POLST roles in the transformation of human mammary epithelial cells (HMECs) in conjunction with LT and Ras.
  • Investigation of SVST and POLST binding affinities and interactions with protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) scaffolding subunits (Aα and Aβ).
  • Functional analysis of PP2A subunit Aβ knockdown to mimic POLST-induced apoptosis.
  • Identification of distinct protein substrates dephosphorylated by SVST and POLST, including lipins.

Main Results:

  • Both SVST and POLST promote cell cycle progression.
  • POLST inhibits differentiation in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and C2C12 myoblasts, whereas SVST does not.
  • POLST induces apoptosis in mouse embryo fibroblasts, while SVST reduces FOXO1 proapoptotic activity.
  • SVST collaborates with LT and Ras for HMEC transformation, but POLST does not.
  • POLST binds both Aα and Aβ subunits of PP2A, while SVST binds only Aα.
  • Knockdown of Aβ mimics POLST-induced apoptosis, suggesting its critical role.
  • POLST dephosphorylates substrates like lipins, which are not targeted by SVST.

Conclusions:

  • SVST and POLST exhibit significant functional divergence in cellular processes, including differentiation, survival, and transformation.
  • Differential interaction with PP2A subunits, particularly Aβ, underlies key functional differences, including POLST-induced apoptosis.
  • The distinct substrate specificities for dephosphorylation contribute to the varied biological outcomes mediated by SVST and POLST.

Related Concept Videos