Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting01:18

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

The guidelines and strategies provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) offer essential principles for ensuring safe and secure computer charting systems in healthcare settings. Let's break down each recommendation:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures01:22

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)01:30

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) is a science-based, preventive system used globally to ensure food safety by identifying, evaluating, and controlling biological, chemical, and physical hazards throughout food production. Originally developed by NASA and the Pillsbury Company for astronaut food, HACCP is now a core component of the Codex Alimentarius.HACCP operates on prerequisite programs—such as Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs), sanitation procedures, and supplier...
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report01:21

Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report

An Incident or Occurrence Report in a healthcare setting is a crucial document used to record any unexpected occurrence that may or may not have affected a patient, employee, or visitor. Such reports are critical to improving patient safety and include all details leading up to and including the event.
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trends in Women Authoring Editorials in Cardiothoracic Surgery Journals.

Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same author

Biologic Management in Severe Asthma for Adults: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline.

Chest·2025
Same author

Marine Microplastic Levels and the Prevalence of Cardiometabolic Diseases in US Coastline Counties.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2025
Same author

Impact of Marine Microplastics on Neurologic and Functional Disabilities: A Population-Level Study.

European journal of neurology·2025
Same author

Robotic Belsey fundoplication: How I do it.

JTCVS techniques·2025
Same author

Robotic lobectomy with en bloc chest wall resection and reconstruction: How I do it.

JTCVS techniques·2025

Related Experiment Videos

Preventing wrong site, procedure, and patient events using a common cause analysis.

Renee Mallett1, Megan Conroy, Lisa Zaidain Saslaw

  • 1The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA. renee.mallett@osumc.edu

American Journal of Medical Quality : the Official Journal of the American College of Medical Quality
|August 13, 2011
PubMed
Summary

A medical center reduced wrong-site surgeries by analyzing common cause analysis (CCA) findings. Identifying failures in rules, policies, procedures, scheduling, and fatigue led to process improvements, preventing further events.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Patient Safety
  • Medical Error Analysis

Background:

  • The medical center reported 8 wrong-site, wrong-procedure, or wrong-patient events between April 2008 and January 2010.
  • Sentinel events trigger a root cause analysis (RCA) within 45 days at this institution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a common cause analysis (CCA) on 8 wrong-site/procedure/patient events.
  • To identify causal factors and trends contributing to these medical errors.
  • To develop targeted interventions to prevent recurrence.

Main Methods:

  • A common cause analysis (CCA) was performed on all 8 reported events.
  • Failure modes were categorized, with a focus on Rules, Policies, and Procedures, and Human Factors (Scheduling and Fatigue).
  • A multidisciplinary team confirmed findings and developed corrective processes.

Main Results:

  • The CCA identified 22 failure modes in Rules, Policies, and Procedures.
  • 17 failure modes were identified within Human Factors: Scheduling and Fatigue.
  • No wrong-site, wrong-procedure, or wrong-patient events have occurred in the year following intervention.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing systemic issues in rules, policies, procedures, scheduling, and fatigue is critical for preventing wrong-site events.
  • Multidisciplinary collaboration is effective in identifying and mitigating patient safety risks.
  • Process improvements based on CCA findings significantly enhanced patient safety and eliminated specific medical errors.