Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: clinical results
Ali Fadlallah1, Daoud Fahed, Khalil Khalil
1Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon. fahd@ocbleb.com
Purpose:
To assess the effectiveness, safety, and comfort of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using the Amaris laser platform.
Setting:
Ophthalmic Consultants of Beirut, Jal-El-Dib, Metn, Lebanon.
Design:
Comparative case series.
Methods:
Myopic eyes with or without astigmatism were treated by transepithelial PRK (study group) and compared with variable-adjusted eyes treated by conventional PRK (control group) during which the epithelium was removed with alcohol. Postoperative pain, epithelial healing time, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction, and haze were analyzed.
Results:
The mean subjective postoperative pain score (out of 10, indicating worst pain) at 48 hours was 2.0 in the study group (50 eyes) and 4.5 in the control group (50 eyes) (P=.02). The mean time to complete epithelial healing was 2.5 days ± 0.6 (SD) and 3.7 ± 0.8 days, respectively (P=.01). At 1 week, the UDVA was statistically significantly better in the control group; however, at 3 months, there was no statistically significant difference in UDVA, corrected distance visual acuity, or manifest refraction between the groups. Haze was significantly less in the study group (P<.01).
Conclusions:
Transepithelial PRK for mild to moderate myopia with or without astigmatism was safe and easier to perform than conventional PRK, and patients had less pain, less postoperative haze, and a faster healing time. The visual outcomes with the 2 techniques were comparable.
Financial Disclosure:
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
