Processing and analysis of roadway runoff micro (< 20 μm) particles
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Multimodal Analysis of Microplastics in Drinking Water using a Silicon Nanomembrane Analysis Pipeline
Published on: June 13, 2025
Masoud Kayhanian1, Brandon Givens
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Ghausi Hall, Davis, CA 95616, USA. mdkayhanian@ucdavis.edu
Abstract:
This study was performed to compare paper and sieving filtration methods for processing micro particles (< 20 μm) in roadway runoff for water quality evaluation. The consequence of a lack of reliable particle processing on particle number, particle concentration and particulate elemental composition, as well as their influence on particle mass and pollutant load calculations, is discussed. Results show that the paper filtering method can affect the measurement of particle size distributions of highway runoff samples. Contrary to common practice, it is not always correct to assume that the number and concentration of particles < 38 μm is the same as the number and concentration of particles < 20 μm. Processed samples for micro particles were most similar to unprocessed samples when nylon sieves were used. Samples filtered by paper deviated significantly from unprocessed samples. These deviations can cause inaccuracies up to 90 percent, in particle count and concentration, TSS calculations, elemental mass composition, and particle and elemental mass loading.
Related Concept Videos
Precipitation Processes
Precipitate Formation and Particle Size Control
The obtained precipitate should be either a pure substance of known composition or easily converted to one by a simple process, such as ignition or drying. In addition, the precipitate should be insoluble and easily filterable. In general, filterability...
Precipitation and Co-precipitation

