Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A statistical analysis of the third UKEMS collaborative trial.

M H Green1, S K Cook, J Cole

  • 1MRC Cell Mutation Unit, Sussex University, Falmer, Brighton, UK.

Mutagenesis
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Different goals, common ground: A global perspective on dairy breeding objectives.

JDS communications·2026
Same author

APOB to estimated APOB ratio for screening for the APOE2 genotype.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

The effect of pollutant exposure on cough in progressive pulmonary fibrosis.

IJTLD open·2025
Same author

Sedation, temperature and pressure after cardiac arrest and resuscitation-The STEPCARE trial: A statistical analysis plan.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2025
Same author

Development and evaluation of a high-fidelity, multi-disciplinary simulation training course for high-consequence infectious diseases using fluorescence visualization.

The Journal of hospital infection·2024
Same author

Multilingual tactical combat casualty care card: a combined Japanese self defense force and US military project.

BMJ military health·2024
Same journal

How genotoxic is the indoor air environment?

Mutagenesis·2026
Same journal

Unveiling the Genotoxic Safety and Antioxidant-Mediated DNA Protective Mechanisms of Triammonium Citrate: An Integrated In Vitro and In Silico Approach.

Mutagenesis·2026
Same journal

Nutritional maternal factors affect the frequency of DNA damage in newborns.

Mutagenesis·2026
Same journal

Potassium bromate as a probable human Carcinogen: multi-organ toxicity and chemopreventive potential of dietary antioxidants-a comprehensive review.

Mutagenesis·2026
Same journal

DNA damage in the leukocytes of nanocomposite-exposed workers.

Mutagenesis·2026
Same journal

Ultra-Processed Foods and Diet Quality in Long COVID: Associations with Symptom Burden, DNA Damage, and Inflammation.

Mutagenesis·2026
See all related articles

This study validated mammalian cell mutagenicity assays for reliable data. Statistical analysis confirmed assay utility and highlighted the importance of independent replicates for accurate mutagenicity testing.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Genetics
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Mammalian cell mutagenicity assays are crucial for assessing chemical safety.
  • Standardized protocols and statistical evaluation are essential for reliable results.
  • The UKEMS collaborative trials aim to improve and validate these assays.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of optimized mammalian cell mutagenicity assays across multiple laboratories.
  • To assess the suitability of existing statistical guidelines for analyzing mutagenicity data.
  • To identify factors influencing data variability and interpretation in mutagenicity testing.

Main Methods:

  • Nine laboratories optimized and applied mammalian cell mutagenicity assays (plate and fluctuation tests) to three reference mutagens.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data were analyzed using UKEMS guidelines for statistical evaluation.
  • Statistical package GLIM was used for supplementary analysis of influencing factors.

    • Main Results:

    • The assays generated clear, statistically analyzable data, confirming their utility.
    • Variation between replicate treatments was significantly larger than technical variation, supporting the need for independent replicates.
    • Potential underestimation of significance and inter-experiment variability were noted, requiring careful interpretation.
    • Factors like expression time and S9 level were unlikely to interfere with mutagen detection in this dataset.

    Conclusions:

    • Optimized mammalian cell mutagenicity assays provide reliable data amenable to statistical analysis.
    • Adherence to statistical guidelines and proper experimental design (independent replicates) are critical.
    • Careful consideration of inter-experiment variability is necessary for accurate interpretation of mutagenicity test results.