Related Experiment Videos
Antifungal prophylaxis in bone marrow transplantation
1Leukaemia Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Reviews of Infectious Diseases
|March 1, 1990
Summary
Deep fungal infections pose a significant risk for bone marrow transplant recipients, especially during prolonged neutropenia. Current prophylactic antifungals are disappointing, necessitating novel strategies for prevention.
Area of Science:
- Medical Mycology
- Hematology
- Transplant Medicine
Background:
- Deep fungal infections are a major cause of mortality in bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients.
- Prolonged neutropenia is the primary risk factor for invasive fungal disease in this population.
- Candida and Aspergillus species are the most frequent pathogens encountered.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the efficacy of current antifungal prophylaxis strategies in BMT recipients.
- To discuss emerging antifungal agents and novel measures for preventing fungal infections in BMT patients.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on antifungal prophylaxis in bone marrow transplantation.
- Analysis of the limitations of current prophylactic agents like oral polyenes (nystatin, amphotericin B) and ketoconazole.
- Discussion of the potential of new antifungal agents and preventive strategies.
Main Results:
- Oral polyene prophylaxis has yielded disappointing results in preventing deep fungal infections.
- Systemic amphotericin B, while effective for treatment, is too toxic for prophylaxis.
- Ketoconazole has limitations due to contraindications with cyclosporine and adverse reactions at effective doses.
Conclusions:
- Existing antifungal prophylaxis regimens for BMT recipients are inadequate.
- There is a critical need for improved and safer antifungal strategies to prevent invasive fungal infections.
- Further research into novel antifungal agents and preventive measures is essential for improving outcomes in BMT patients.